Presmooi (Pty) Ltd, Savyon Building (Pty) Ltd and Another v Drystone Investments (Pty) Ltd and Others (016527) [2013] ZACT 53 (14 June 2013)
The Tribunal found that the proposed merger would not result in a substantial lessening or prevention of competition in any relevant market, as the market share accretions were minimal and post-merger market shares remained low. The Tribunal accepted the Commission's analysis regarding product classification and geographic overlap, and agreed that no further competition analysis was required. On the public interest issue, the Tribunal imposed conditions to protect employment, requiring that no employees of the target firms be retrenched as a result of the merger for two years, except in cases of voluntary separation, early retirement, or reasonable refusal to redeploy. The Tribunal...
- Citation
- [2013] ZACT 53
- Parties
- Applicant: Presmooi (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: Savyon Building (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: IPS Investments (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Drystone Investments (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Odeon Investments (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Adamax Property Projects; Respondent: Persequor Park (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 2013
- Case Number
- 016527
- Procedural Posture
- Merger Application / Tribunal Approval With Conditions
- Outcome
- Merger conditionally approved subject to employment protection conditions.
- Judges
- Norman Manoim, Mondo Mazwai, Andiswa Ndoni
- Legal Topics
- Merger Control, Market Share Analysis, Public Interest Conditions, Retrenchment Protection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Presmooi (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Savyon Building (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
IPS Investments (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Drystone Investments (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Odeon Investments (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Adamax Property Projects
Respondent
Persequor Park (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Merger Application / Tribunal Approval With Conditions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed merger is likely to substantially lessen or prevent competition in the relevant markets.
- 2 Whether the merger raises public interest concerns, particularly regarding potential retrenchments.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the proposed merger would not result in a substantial lessening or prevention of competition in any relevant market, as the market share accretions were minimal and post-merger market shares remained low. The Tribunal accepted the Commission's analysis regarding product classification and geographic overlap, and agreed that no further competition analysis was required. On the public interest issue, the Tribunal imposed conditions to protect employment, requiring that no employees of the target firms be retrenched as a result of the merger for two years, except in cases of voluntary separation, early retirement, or reasonable refusal to redeploy. The Tribunal...
Court Disposition
Merger conditionally approved subject to employment protection conditions.
Orders
- No employees of the target firms shall be retrenched as a result of this merger within two years after the approval date, except for voluntary separation, early retirement, or reasonable refusal to redeploy.
- Should the acquiring firms wish to retrench within the two-year period, they must notify the Commission and motivate why such retrenchments are not merger-specific or merger-related.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment