Presmooi (Pty) Ltd, Savyon Building (Pty) Ltd and Another v Drystone Investments (Pty) Ltd and Others (016527) [2013] ZACT 53 (14 June 2013)

Presmooi (Pty) Ltd, Savyon Building (Pty) Ltd and Another v Drystone Investments (Pty) Ltd and Others (016527) [2013] ZACT 53 (14 June 2013)

The Tribunal found that the proposed merger would not result in a substantial lessening or prevention of competition in any relevant market, as the market share accretions were minimal and post-merger market shares remained low. The Tribunal accepted the Commission's analysis regarding product classification and geographic overlap, and agreed that no further competition analysis was required. On the public interest issue, the Tribunal imposed conditions to protect employment, requiring that no employees of the target firms be retrenched as a result of the merger for two years, except in cases of voluntary separation, early retirement, or reasonable refusal to redeploy. The Tribunal...

Citation
[2013] ZACT 53
Parties
Applicant: Presmooi (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: Savyon Building (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: IPS Investments (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Drystone Investments (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Odeon Investments (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Adamax Property Projects; Respondent: Persequor Park (Pty) Ltd
Court
Competition Tribunal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
14 June 2013
Case Number
016527
Procedural Posture
Merger Application / Tribunal Approval With Conditions
Outcome
Merger conditionally approved subject to employment protection conditions.
Judges
Norman Manoim, Mondo Mazwai, Andiswa Ndoni
Legal Topics
Merger Control, Market Share Analysis, Public Interest Conditions, Retrenchment Protection

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Presmooi (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

Savyon Building (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

IPS Investments (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

Drystone Investments (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Odeon Investments (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Adamax Property Projects

Respondent

Persequor Park (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Merger Application / Tribunal Approval With Conditions

  1. 1 Whether the proposed merger is likely to substantially lessen or prevent competition in the relevant markets.
  2. 2 Whether the merger raises public interest concerns, particularly regarding potential retrenchments.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the proposed merger would not result in a substantial lessening or prevention of competition in any relevant market, as the market share accretions were minimal and post-merger market shares remained low. The Tribunal accepted the Commission's analysis regarding product classification and geographic overlap, and agreed that no further competition analysis was required. On the public interest issue, the Tribunal imposed conditions to protect employment, requiring that no employees of the target firms be retrenched as a result of the merger for two years, except in cases of voluntary separation, early retirement, or reasonable refusal to redeploy. The Tribunal...

Court Disposition

Merger conditionally approved subject to employment protection conditions.

Orders

  • No employees of the target firms shall be retrenched as a result of this merger within two years after the approval date, except for voluntary separation, early retirement, or reasonable refusal to redeploy.
  • Should the acquiring firms wish to retrench within the two-year period, they must notify the Commission and motivate why such retrenchments are not merger-specific or merger-related.