Pretorius and Others v Minister of Justice and Correctional Services and Others (2016/83909) [2018] ZAGPPHC 347; 2018 (2) SACR 501 (GP) (14 May 2018)
The court found that the policy prohibiting the use of personal computers in prison cells for study purposes constitutes unfair discrimination against the applicants under the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act. The respondents failed to provide sufficient factual justification for the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] ZAGPPHC 347
- Parties
- Applicant: Wilhelm Pretorius; Applicant: Dr. Johan Pretorius; Applicant: Dr. Johan (Lets) Pretorius; Respondent: Minister of Justice and Correctional Services; Respondent: National Commissioner Department of Correctional Services; Respondent: Head of Prison, Zonderwater Prison
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 14 May 2018
- Case Number
- 2016/83909
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted. The policy procedures on formal education programmes, insofar as they prohibit the use of personal laptops without a modem in cells, are declared to constitute unfair discrimination against the applicants.
- Judges
- Swanepoel
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Discrimination, Right to Education, Limitation of Rights, Prisoner Rights, Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wilhelm Pretorius
Applicant
Dr. Johan Pretorius
Applicant
Dr. Johan (Lets) Pretorius
Applicant
Minister of Justice and Correctional Services
Respondent
National Commissioner Department of Correctional Services
Respondent
Head of Prison, Zonderwater Prison
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the policy prohibiting the use of personal computers in prison cells for study purposes constitutes unfair discrimination against the applicants.
- 2 Whether the limitation of the right to further education for prisoners is justified under the Constitution.
- 3 Whether the respondents have discharged the burden to justify the limitation imposed by the policy.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the policy prohibiting the use of personal computers in prison cells for study purposes constitutes unfair discrimination against the applicants under the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act. The respondents failed to provide sufficient factual justification for the limitation, as no evidence was presented of actual security breaches resulting from the use of computers in cells. The applicants' right to further education is protected by the Constitution, and the limitation imposed by the policy is not reasonable or proportionate, especially given the applicants' spotless security records and the absence of individualized assessment. The...
Court Disposition
Application granted. The policy procedures on formal education programmes, insofar as they prohibit the use of personal laptops without a modem in cells, are declared to constitute unfair discrimination against the applicants.
Orders
- The Policy Procedures on Formal Education Programmes, as approved by the second respondent, insofar as they relate to the use of personal laptops without a modem in any communal or single cell, are declared to constitute unfair discrimination against the applicants under the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of...
- First, second and third applicants are entitled to use their personal computers without the use of a modem in their cells for as long as they remain registered students with any recognized tertiary institution in South Africa.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment