Pretorius v Botha (59005/2015) [2016] ZAGPPHC 634 (28 July 2016)
The court found that, after considering all the facts, the judgment, the heads of argument, authorities, and oral arguments, there are no reasonable prospects that another court would come to a different conclusion. Therefore, the application for leave to appeal must be dismissed, and the applicant is ordered to pay the costs of the application.
- Citation
- [2016] ZAGPPHC 634
- Parties
- Applicant: Pieter Gerard Pretorius; Respondent: Elise Botha
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2016
- Case Number
- 59005/2015
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- C Pretorius
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Costs Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pieter Gerard Pretorius
Applicant
Elise Botha
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for leave to appeal has reasonable prospects of success.
- 2 Whether the applicant should be ordered to pay the costs of the application.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, after considering all the facts, the judgment, the heads of argument, authorities, and oral arguments, there are no reasonable prospects that another court would come to a different conclusion. Therefore, the application for leave to appeal must be dismissed, and the applicant is ordered to pay the costs of the application.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
- The applicant is to pay the costs of the application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment