Pretorius v Krugel N.O and Others (3326/2022) [2022] ZAMPMBHC 57 (14 July 2022)
The court found that Section 26(1A) of the Administration of Estates Act does not confer an unfettered discretion on the executor but enables the executor to provide for the subsistence of the deceased's family before the estate account lies open for inspection, subject to the Master's consent. The applicant, as surviving spouse and mother of a minor child, is entitled to claim interim maintenance from the estate, and the court, as upper guardian of minor children, is empowered to intervene where the executor fails to act. The statutory procedure for claims does not exclude common law remedies, and the absence of creditors or evidence of insolvency does not preclude interim maintenance....
- Citation
- [2022] ZAMPMBHC 57
- Parties
- Applicant: Cindy Pretorius; Respondent: Johan Moodie Krugel N.O.; Respondent: J Joachim Hendrik Botha N.O.; Respondent: The Master of the High Court
- Court
- Mbombela High Court, Mpumalanga
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 14 July 2022
- Case Number
- 3326/2022
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Application for Interim Maintenance Pending Finalisation of Deceased Estate
- Outcome
- Application granted in part; interim maintenance ordered against the first respondent as executor.
- Judges
- Langa
- Legal Topics
- Maintenance of Surviving Spouse, Interim Relief, Administration of Deceased Estates, Preferent Claims, Urgent Application, Minor Child Maintenance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cindy Pretorius
Applicant
Johan Moodie Krugel N.O.
Respondent
J Joachim Hendrik Botha N.O.
Respondent
The Master of the High Court
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application for Interim Maintenance Pending Finalisation of Deceased Estate
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant and her minor child are entitled to interim maintenance from the deceased's estate pending finalisation of the administration.
- 2 Whether the executor can be compelled by court to make maintenance payments prior to the liquidation and distribution account lying open for inspection.
- 3 Whether the application is urgent and whether substantial redress can be obtained in due course.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that Section 26(1A) of the Administration of Estates Act does not confer an unfettered discretion on the executor but enables the executor to provide for the subsistence of the deceased's family before the estate account lies open for inspection, subject to the Master's consent. The applicant, as surviving spouse and mother of a minor child, is entitled to claim interim maintenance from the estate, and the court, as upper guardian of minor children, is empowered to intervene where the executor fails to act. The statutory procedure for claims does not exclude common law remedies, and the absence of creditors or evidence of insolvency does not preclude interim maintenance....
Court Disposition
Application granted in part; interim maintenance ordered against the first respondent as executor.
Orders
- Pending finalisation of the administration of the estate of the late Casper Jeremiah Pretorius and/or financial assistance from Kern Technologies (Pty) Ltd, the First Respondent is ordered to make maintenance payments in the amount of R56,850.00 per month from the deceased's estate towards the Applicant and the...
- The first payment is to be made within 14 days of the date of this order, and subsequent payments on or before the 7th day of each succeeding month.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment