Private Security Industry Regulatory Authority v Anglo Platinum Management Services Ltd (588/05) [2006] ZASCA 176; [2007] 1 All SA 154 (SCA) (29 September 2006)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the Private Security Industry Regulation Act did not prohibit the Minister from granting indefinite exemptions, nor did it confer any express or implied power on the Minister to revoke or limit such exemptions by subsequent regulation. The exemptions granted to the respondents were valid and indefinite, subject only to the conditions originally imposed. Regulation 10(3), which purported to terminate all exemptions after one year unless renewed, was found to be invalid as the Act did not authorise the Minister to make regulations with retrospective effect that would deprive parties of rights already acquired. The court further found that the regulatory...
- Citation
- [2006] ZASCA 176
- Parties
- Appellant: Private Security Industry Regulatory Authority; Respondent: Anglo Platinum Management Services Ltd; Respondent: Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd; Respondent: Lebowa Platinum Mines Ltd; Respondent: Potgietersrus Platinums Ltd
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 29 September 2006
- Case Number
- 588/05
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel.
- Judges
- Cameron, Nugent, Ponnan, Maya, Theron
- Legal Topics
- Ministerial Exemption Powers, Retrospective Regulation, Private Security Industry Regulation Act, Administrative Action, Regulatory Powers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Private Security Industry Regulatory Authority
Appellant
Anglo Platinum Management Services Ltd
Respondent
Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd
Respondent
Lebowa Platinum Mines Ltd
Respondent
Potgietersrus Platinums Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Minister had the power under the Private Security Industry Regulation Act to grant indefinite exemptions.
- 2 Whether the Minister could subsequently make regulations that retroactively terminate or limit previously granted exemptions.
- 3 Whether regulation 10(3) of the Regulations Relating to Appeals and Applications for Exemptions, 2003 is valid.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the Private Security Industry Regulation Act did not prohibit the Minister from granting indefinite exemptions, nor did it confer any express or implied power on the Minister to revoke or limit such exemptions by subsequent regulation. The exemptions granted to the respondents were valid and indefinite, subject only to the conditions originally imposed. Regulation 10(3), which purported to terminate all exemptions after one year unless renewed, was found to be invalid as the Act did not authorise the Minister to make regulations with retrospective effect that would deprive parties of rights already acquired. The court further found that the regulatory...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed with costs, such costs to include the costs of two counsel.
- Regulation 10(3) of the Regulations Relating to Appeals and Applications for Exemptions, 2003 is declared invalid.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment