Pro-Khaya Construction CC v Independent Development Trust (3065/2015) [2016] ZAECPEHC 10; [2016] 2 All SA 909 (ECP) (22 March 2016)
The court found that there was a valid and consensual agreement between the parties, through their attorneys, to refer all disputes—including those in the High Court action and costs—to arbitration. The respondent's denial of participation and knowledge was rejected as untenable, given the correspondence and conduct of its attorneys. The citation of the Trust was condoned as all trustees were effectively before the court. The arbitrator acted within his powers, permitted procedural amendments, and applied the correct interest rate as per the JBCC agreement and legislation. The Trust failed to establish any grounds for setting aside the award under section 33(1) of the Arbitration Act. The...
- Citation
- [2016] ZAECPEHC 10
- Parties
- Applicant: Pro-Khaya Construction CC; Respondent: The Trustees for the time being of The Independent Development Trust
- Court
- Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 22 March 2016
- Case Number
- 3065/2015
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Application to Make Arbitration Award an Order of Court; Counter Application to Set Aside Award
- Outcome
- Application granted; arbitration award made an order of court. Counter-application dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- J M Roberson
- Legal Topics
- Arbitration Act 1965, Principal Building Agreement, Default Arbitration Award, Interest on Judgments, Costs Award, Lis Alibi Pendens
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pro-Khaya Construction CC
Applicant
The Trustees for the time being of The Independent Development Trust
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application to Make Arbitration Award an Order of Court; Counter Application to Set Aside Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arbitration award should be made an order of court under section 31(1) of the Arbitration Act 42 of 1965.
- 2 Whether the respondent was properly cited and before the court.
- 3 Whether there was a valid agreement to refer the disputes to arbitration.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that there was a valid and consensual agreement between the parties, through their attorneys, to refer all disputes—including those in the High Court action and costs—to arbitration. The respondent's denial of participation and knowledge was rejected as untenable, given the correspondence and conduct of its attorneys. The citation of the Trust was condoned as all trustees were effectively before the court. The arbitrator acted within his powers, permitted procedural amendments, and applied the correct interest rate as per the JBCC agreement and legislation. The Trust failed to establish any grounds for setting aside the award under section 33(1) of the Arbitration Act. The...
Court Disposition
Application granted; arbitration award made an order of court. Counter-application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The arbitration award of Mr Kevin Trisk SC published on 27 July 2015 is made an order of court under section 31(1) of the Arbitration Act 42 of 1965.
- The respondent is to pay the applicant R10,877,268.58.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment