Professional Aviation Services (Pty) Ltd v City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality (37721/2021) [2024] ZAGPPHC 384 (16 April 2024)
The court found that the City of Tshwane failed to provide any, let alone a sufficient, explanation for its delay in launching the review application. The delay, spanning over two years, was unreasonable and not condonable. The nature of the impugned procurement decisions did not support a finding of unlawfulness, as the initial agreement was automatically renewed in terms of its clauses and the deviations were justified by exceptional circumstances. The City’s conduct demonstrated a lack of effective oversight and a pattern of procedural non-compliance, suggesting the review application was a reactionary attempt to avoid payment rather than a bona fide challenge. The court held that the...
- Citation
- [2024] ZAGPPHC 384
- Parties
- Applicant: Professional Aviation Services (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality; Respondent: Leanda Kock-Ackerman N.O.
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 16 April 2024
- Case Number
- 37721/2021
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment on Review and Condonation
- Outcome
- The arbitration award is made an order of court; the City’s counter application for review is dismissed with costs; condonation is granted for certain late filings but not for the delay in launching the review.
- Judges
- L.A. Retief
- Legal Topics
- Municipal Procurement, Condonation of Delay, Arbitration Award Enforcement, Legality Review, Service Level Agreement, Automatic Renewal of Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Professional Aviation Services (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality
Respondent
Leanda Kock-Ackerman N.O.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment on Review and Condonation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the delay by the City of Tshwane in launching its self-review application was undue and condonable.
- 2 Whether the impugned procurement decisions of 28 November 2018 and 1 August 2019 were unlawful and should be set aside.
- 3 Whether the arbitration award should be made an order of court.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the City of Tshwane failed to provide any, let alone a sufficient, explanation for its delay in launching the review application. The delay, spanning over two years, was unreasonable and not condonable. The nature of the impugned procurement decisions did not support a finding of unlawfulness, as the initial agreement was automatically renewed in terms of its clauses and the deviations were justified by exceptional circumstances. The City’s conduct demonstrated a lack of effective oversight and a pattern of procedural non-compliance, suggesting the review application was a reactionary attempt to avoid payment rather than a bona fide challenge. The court held that the...
Court Disposition
The arbitration award is made an order of court; the City’s counter application for review is dismissed with costs; condonation is granted for certain late filings but not for the delay in launching the review.
Orders
- The Arbitrator’s award dated 12 March 2021, as supplemented and amended on 17 March 2021, is made an order of court.
- The First Respondent is ordered to pay the costs occasioned by prayer 1.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment