Proflour (Pty) Ltd and Another v Grindrod Trading (Pty) Ltd t/a Atlas Trading and Shipping and Another (14397/2009) [2009] ZAKZDHC 75; [2010] 2 All SA 510 (KZD) (15 December 2009)
The court found that the Invoice Discounting Agreements (IDAs) did not novate or extinguish the Nedbank cessions. The evidence, including the parties' conduct and correspondence, demonstrated no intention to replace the Nedbank cessions; rather, the parties expressly provided for the cancellation of the Nedbank cessions as a prerequisite for performance under the IDAs. The manuscript limitation in the second applicant's Nedbank cession did not render it invalid, as it merely limited the value of the debts ceded and did not constitute an impermissible partial cession. The Nedbank cessions were held to be cessions in securitatem debiti, not out-and-out cessions, as there was no provision...
- Citation
- [2009] ZAKZDHC 75
- Parties
- Applicant: Proflour (Pty) Limited; Applicant: Durban Grits (Pty) Limited; Respondent: Grindrod Trading (Pty) Limited t/a Atlas Trading & Shipping; Respondent: Nedbank Limited
- Court
- Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Durban
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 2009
- Case Number
- 14397/2009
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Application for Declaratory and Interdictory Relief
- Outcome
- Application granted in part: declaratory relief awarded to applicants; first respondent not entitled to collect book debts pending payment of applicants' indebtedness to second respondent.
- Judges
- Swain
- Legal Topics
- Cession of Book Debts, Novation, Security Interests, Interpretation of Contracts, Partial Cession, Reversionary Interest
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Proflour (Pty) Limited
Applicant
Durban Grits (Pty) Limited
Applicant
Grindrod Trading (Pty) Limited t/a Atlas Trading & Shipping
Respondent
Nedbank Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application for Declaratory and Interdictory Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Invoice Discounting Agreements (IDAs) novated and extinguished the Nedbank cessions.
- 2 Whether the first respondent is entitled to collect the applicants' book debts before the applicants' indebtedness to the second respondent is extinguished.
- 3 Whether the manuscript limitation in the second applicant's Nedbank cession renders it invalid as a partial cession or for uncertainty.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Invoice Discounting Agreements (IDAs) did not novate or extinguish the Nedbank cessions. The evidence, including the parties' conduct and correspondence, demonstrated no intention to replace the Nedbank cessions; rather, the parties expressly provided for the cancellation of the Nedbank cessions as a prerequisite for performance under the IDAs. The manuscript limitation in the second applicant's Nedbank cession did not render it invalid, as it merely limited the value of the debts ceded and did not constitute an impermissible partial cession. The Nedbank cessions were held to be cessions in securitatem debiti, not out-and-out cessions, as there was no provision...
Court Disposition
Application granted in part: declaratory relief awarded to applicants; first respondent not entitled to collect book debts pending payment of applicants' indebtedness to second respondent.
Orders
- It is declared that pending payment by the applicants of their indebtedness to the second respondent, the first respondent is not entitled, in terms of Annexure D to the founding affidavit of David Fraser Strang, to collect the book debts of the applicants from the applicants' debtors.
- The first respondent is ordered to pay the costs of the applicants.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment