Protech Khuthele (Pty) Ltd and Another v Wabile NO and Others (JR 179/11) [2012] ZALCJHB 168; (2013) 34 ILJ 1246 (LC) (12 October 2012)

Protech Khuthele (Pty) Ltd and Another v Wabile NO and Others (JR 179/11) [2012] ZALCJHB 168; (2013) 34 ILJ 1246 (LC) (12 October 2012)

The court held that the commissioner’s prior association with SACCAWU, a COSATU affiliate, did not create a reasonable apprehension of bias in arbitration proceedings involving NUM, another COSATU affiliate. There was no direct relationship between the commissioner and NUM, nor did the subject matter of the arbitration arise from the commissioner’s prior employment or SACCAWU’s affiliation. The mere fact of shared trade union federation membership is insufficient to establish bias. The commissioner was not obliged to disclose his prior association, as it was not reasonably relevant to a recusal application. The diversity of commissioners’ backgrounds is inevitable and desirable, provided...

Citation
[2012] ZALCJHB 168
Parties
Applicant: Protech Khuthele (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: Pela Plant (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Katholo Wabile N.O.; Respondent: Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration; Respondent: National Union of Mineworkers
Court
Labour Court Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
12 October 2012
Case Number
JR 179/11
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment on Limited Ground for Review (recusal/bias)
Outcome
Application for review based on apprehension of bias dismissed with costs.
Judges
Van Niekerk
Legal Topics
Recusal of Commissioner, Apprehension of Bias, Trade Union Affiliation, Arbitration Review, Ccma Code of Conduct

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Protech Khuthele (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

Pela Plant (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

Katholo Wabile N.O.

Respondent

Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration

Respondent

National Union of Mineworkers

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Review Application / Judgment on Limited Ground for Review (recusal/bias)

  1. 1 Whether the commissioner’s prior association with SACCAWU, a COSATU affiliate, created a reasonable apprehension of bias in arbitration proceedings involving NUM, also a COSATU affiliate.
  2. 2 Whether the commissioner was obliged to disclose his prior employment with SACCAWU to the parties.
  3. 3 Whether failure to disclose such association constitutes a reviewable irregularity justifying setting aside the arbitration award.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the commissioner’s prior association with SACCAWU, a COSATU affiliate, did not create a reasonable apprehension of bias in arbitration proceedings involving NUM, another COSATU affiliate. There was no direct relationship between the commissioner and NUM, nor did the subject matter of the arbitration arise from the commissioner’s prior employment or SACCAWU’s affiliation. The mere fact of shared trade union federation membership is insufficient to establish bias. The commissioner was not obliged to disclose his prior association, as it was not reasonably relevant to a recusal application. The diversity of commissioners’ backgrounds is inevitable and desirable, provided...

Court Disposition

Application for review based on apprehension of bias dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The applicants’ ground for review based on the contention that the first respondent was biased on account of his prior association with the South African Commercial Catering and Allied Workers Union is dismissed.
  • Costs are awarded against the applicants.