PSA obo Jhupsee v Ngako NO and Others (JR1956/15) [2017] ZALCJHB 437 (24 November 2017)
The Court held that the non-joinder of Ms Mancotywa, against whom contempt is sought, is a fatal defect as she has a direct and substantial legal interest in the relief claimed. Without her being joined as a party, the review application cannot be entertained. The applicant failed to demonstrate any exceptional circumstances or just and equitable grounds as required by section 158(1B) of the LRA to justify review before finalisation of arbitration. The application to strike out portions of the respondent's answering affidavit was dismissed as the applicant did not establish that the impugned paragraphs were scandalous, vexatious, or irrelevant, nor that prejudice would result if they...
- Citation
- [2017] ZALCJHB 437
- Parties
- Applicant: PSA obo S Jhupsee; Respondent: Commissioner PM Ngako N.O.; Respondent: General Public Service Sectoral Bargaining Council (Pretoria); Respondent: Department of Environmental Affairs
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 24 November 2017
- Case Number
- JR1956/15
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment on Review Application and Interlocutory Strike Out Application
- Outcome
- Review application struck off the roll due to non-joinder and lack of exceptional circumstances; application to strike out dismissed; no order as to costs.
- Judges
- Mabaso
- Legal Topics
- Contempt of Bargaining Council, Non Joinder, Application to Strike Out, Exceptional Circumstances Review, Section 158 Lra, Section 142 Lra
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
PSA obo S Jhupsee
Applicant
Commissioner PM Ngako N.O.
Respondent
General Public Service Sectoral Bargaining Council (Pretoria)
Respondent
Department of Environmental Affairs
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment on Review Application and Interlocutory Strike Out Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the non-joinder of Ms Mancotywa, the Chief Director, renders the review application fatally defective.
- 2 Whether the applicant has established grounds for striking out portions of the respondent's answering affidavit.
- 3 Whether exceptional circumstances exist to justify entertaining the review application before finalisation of arbitration, as required by section 158(1B) of the LRA.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the non-joinder of Ms Mancotywa, against whom contempt is sought, is a fatal defect as she has a direct and substantial legal interest in the relief claimed. Without her being joined as a party, the review application cannot be entertained. The applicant failed to demonstrate any exceptional circumstances or just and equitable grounds as required by section 158(1B) of the LRA to justify review before finalisation of arbitration. The application to strike out portions of the respondent's answering affidavit was dismissed as the applicant did not establish that the impugned paragraphs were scandalous, vexatious, or irrelevant, nor that prejudice would result if they...
Court Disposition
Review application struck off the roll due to non-joinder and lack of exceptional circumstances; application to strike out dismissed; no order as to costs.
Orders
- The application to stay the proceedings under the Second Respondent’s case number G PBC 838/2013 is not granted.
- The application to strike out part of the respondent’s answering affidavit fails.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment