P.S.R v L.S.R (35539/14) [2021] ZAGPPHC 279 (19 April 2021)

P.S.R v L.S.R (35539/14) [2021] ZAGPPHC 279 (19 April 2021)

The court found that both parties were responsible for the escalation of costs due to their attorneys' failure to communicate effectively. The error in describing the pension funds necessitated the application, but neither party was solely to blame. The court held that the divorce order should be varied to correctly reflect the pension funds and the division of benefits, with each party entitled to 50% of the other's pension interest as at the date of divorce. Given the shared responsibility for the costs, the court ordered that each party pay their own costs.

Citation
[2021] ZAGPPHC 279
Parties
Applicant: P.S.R; Respondent: L.S.R
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
19 April 2021
Case Number
35539/14
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application to Amend Divorce Order
Outcome
Application granted. Divorce order varied. Each party to pay own costs.
Judges
C.P. Rabie
Legal Topics
Variation of Divorce Order, Pension Fund Division, Costs Award
Family and Children Civil Procedure Variation of Divorce Order Pension Fund Division Costs Award

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

P.S.R

Applicant

L.S.R

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Urgent Application / Application to Amend Divorce Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the divorce order should be amended to correctly reflect the pension funds and division of benefits.
  2. 2 Whether either party should be liable for the costs of the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that both parties were responsible for the escalation of costs due to their attorneys' failure to communicate effectively. The error in describing the pension funds necessitated the application, but neither party was solely to blame. The court held that the divorce order should be varied to correctly reflect the pension funds and the division of benefits, with each party entitled to 50% of the other's pension interest as at the date of divorce. Given the shared responsibility for the costs, the court ordered that each party pay their own costs.

Court Disposition

Application granted. Divorce order varied. Each party to pay own costs.

Orders

  • The decree of divorce granted on 25 April 2016, as amended on 28 November 2018, is varied by substituting paragraphs 4 and 5 of the order of 28 November 2018 with the new pension fund descriptions and division of benefits.
  • Each party shall pay his/her own costs of the application.