Qhamokoane v Road Accident Fund (1089/2021) [2025] ZAFSHC 42 (6 February 2025)

Qhamokoane v Road Accident Fund (1089/2021) [2025] ZAFSHC 42 (6 February 2025)

The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove any past loss of earnings on a balance of probabilities, as his evidence regarding prior employment was inconsistent and unsupported by collateral evidence. However, the court accepted that the plaintiff's injuries rendered him unsuitable for work of high physical demand, thereby diminishing his future employment opportunities. The actuarial calculations for future loss of income were accepted, but the court applied a higher-than-normal contingency deduction of 25% due to the plaintiff's youth, medical condition, and prevailing economic uncertainties. The total future loss of income was calculated at R1,094,354.25. For general damages,...

Citation
[2025] ZAFSHC 42
Parties
Plaintiff: Kotedi John Qhamokoane; Defendant: The Road Accident Fund
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
6 February 2025
Case Number
1089/2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Final Judgment
Outcome
The plaintiff's claim for past loss of earnings is dismissed. The claim for future loss of income succeeds, and general damages are awarded.
Judges
Mpama AJ
Legal Topics
Loss of Earnings, General Damages, Contingency Deductions, Onus of Proof, Road Accident Fund Act
Delict Civil Procedure Loss of Earnings General Damages Contingency Deductions Onus of Proof Road Accident Fund Act

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kotedi John Qhamokoane

Plaintiff

The Road Accident Fund

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trial / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Has the plaintiff proved his claim for loss of earnings resulting from the accident.
  2. 2 What is the appropriate amount of general damages to be awarded to the plaintiff.
  3. 3 What contingency deduction should be applied to the calculation of future loss of income.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove any past loss of earnings on a balance of probabilities, as his evidence regarding prior employment was inconsistent and unsupported by collateral evidence. However, the court accepted that the plaintiff's injuries rendered him unsuitable for work of high physical demand, thereby diminishing his future employment opportunities. The actuarial calculations for future loss of income were accepted, but the court applied a higher-than-normal contingency deduction of 25% due to the plaintiff's youth, medical condition, and prevailing economic uncertainties. The total future loss of income was calculated at R1,094,354.25. For general damages,...

Court Disposition

The plaintiff's claim for past loss of earnings is dismissed. The claim for future loss of income succeeds, and general damages are awarded.

Orders

  • The defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff R1,094,354.25 for future loss of income, subject to a 25% contingency deduction.
  • The defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff R1,200,000 as compensation for general damages.