R and Another v Member of the Executive of Education, Gauteng Province and Others (24232/2002) [2009] ZAGPPHC 394 (9 October 2009)
The court found that the second plaintiff, aged 17 years and 8 months, was mature and athletic, and that his conduct in misusing the foefie slide by sliding down with another learner clinging to his waist was unreasonable and not foreseeable by the defendants. The evidence did not support the presence of warning signs at the time of the incident, but this did not translate into liability. The defendants' employees could not reasonably have foreseen that the second plaintiff would use the slide in such a dangerous manner. The plaintiffs failed to prove negligence on the part of the defendants or a causal connection between any alleged negligence and the injuries sustained. Accordingly, the...
- Citation
- [2009] ZAGPPHC 394
- Parties
- Plaintiff: C[...] B[...] R[...]-C[...]; Plaintiff: C[...] J[...] R[...]; Defendant: Member of the Executive of Education, Gauteng Province; Defendant: Frederick Jacobus Venter; Defendant: Bayete Resort Pty (Ltd)
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 9 October 2009
- Case Number
- 24232/2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trial / Merits Only; Claim Against Second Defendant Withdrawn at Commencement
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs' action dismissed; no order as to costs.
- Judges
- Dolamo
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Duty of Care, Vicarious Liability, Personal Injury, Supervision of Learners
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
C[...] B[...] R[...]-C[...]
Plaintiff
C[...] J[...] R[...]
Plaintiff
Member of the Executive of Education, Gauteng Province
Defendant
Frederick Jacobus Venter
Defendant
Bayete Resort Pty (Ltd)
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Merits Only; Claim Against Second Defendant Withdrawn at Commencement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants owed a duty of care to the learners during the camp.
- 2 Whether the defendants or their employees were negligent in supervising the learners using the foefie slide.
- 3 Whether the negligence, if any, was causally connected to the injuries sustained by the second plaintiff.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the second plaintiff, aged 17 years and 8 months, was mature and athletic, and that his conduct in misusing the foefie slide by sliding down with another learner clinging to his waist was unreasonable and not foreseeable by the defendants. The evidence did not support the presence of warning signs at the time of the incident, but this did not translate into liability. The defendants' employees could not reasonably have foreseen that the second plaintiff would use the slide in such a dangerous manner. The plaintiffs failed to prove negligence on the part of the defendants or a causal connection between any alleged negligence and the injuries sustained. Accordingly, the...
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs' action dismissed; no order as to costs.
Orders
- Plaintiffs' action is dismissed.
- No order as to costs is made.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment