Raath and Another v Van Staden N.O and Another (1232/04) [2005] ZANWHC 96 (1 December 2005)
The court found that the case raises important legal questions regarding the interaction between servitude rights and statutory requirements under the National Water Act. Given the complexity and significance of these issues, and the possibility that another court may reach a different conclusion, leave to appeal to the Full Bench is warranted in the interests of justice.
- Citation
- [2005] ZANWHC 96
- Parties
- Applicant: Thelmari Raath; Applicant: Willem Sternberg Van Staden; Respondent: Daniel Van Staden N.O.; Respondent: Magdalena Johanna Van Staden
- Court
- North West High Court, Mafikeng
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 1 December 2005
- Case Number
- 1232/04
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal to the Full Bench of this Division against the whole judgment delivered on 7 July 2005 is granted.
- Judges
- V V Tlhapi
- Legal Topics
- Servitude Rights, Final Interdict, Water Use Licensing, National Water Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thelmari Raath
Applicant
Willem Sternberg Van Staden
Applicant
Daniel Van Staden N.O.
Respondent
Magdalena Johanna Van Staden
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have reasonable prospects of success on appeal against the judgment granting a final interdict.
- 2 Whether the National Water Act affects servitude rights to draw water from a resource.
- 3 Whether a licence under the Act is required in addition to servitude rights.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the case raises important legal questions regarding the interaction between servitude rights and statutory requirements under the National Water Act. Given the complexity and significance of these issues, and the possibility that another court may reach a different conclusion, leave to appeal to the Full Bench is warranted in the interests of justice.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal to the Full Bench of this Division against the whole judgment delivered on 7 July 2005 is granted.
Orders
- Leave to appeal to the Full Bench of this Division against the whole judgment delivered on 7 July 2005 is granted.
- Costs to be costs in the appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment