Rabe v Road Accident Fund (18422/08) [2010] ZAGPPHC 584 (17 February 2010)
The court accepted the actuarial calculations for past and future loss of earnings, applying contingency deductions of 7% and 5% for pre- and post-morbid past income, and 18% and 23% for pre- and post-morbid future income, respectively. The plaintiff's injuries significantly impaired his ability to compete in the open market and forced him to leave his preferred career. The court considered the plaintiff's stable current employment and lack of evidence of future risk, but also acknowledged the failed business venture and diminished prospects. For general damages, the court reviewed comparable awards for similar injuries and, considering the plaintiff's ongoing pain, disability, and loss...
- Citation
- [2010] ZAGPPHC 584
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Rabe P J; Defendant: Road Accident Fund
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 17 February 2010
- Case Number
- 18422/08
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trial / Quantum Determination After Merits Conceded
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim for past and future loss of earnings and general damages is upheld.
- Judges
- R G Tolmay
- Legal Topics
- Road Accident Fund Act, Loss of Earnings, General Damages, Contingency Deductions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rabe P J
Plaintiff
Road Accident Fund
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Quantum Determination After Merits Conceded
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate deduction for contingencies on past and future loss of earnings.
- 2 What amount should be awarded as general damages for pain, suffering, and loss of amenities of life.
Ratio Decidendi
The court accepted the actuarial calculations for past and future loss of earnings, applying contingency deductions of 7% and 5% for pre- and post-morbid past income, and 18% and 23% for pre- and post-morbid future income, respectively. The plaintiff's injuries significantly impaired his ability to compete in the open market and forced him to leave his preferred career. The court considered the plaintiff's stable current employment and lack of evidence of future risk, but also acknowledged the failed business venture and diminished prospects. For general damages, the court reviewed comparable awards for similar injuries and, considering the plaintiff's ongoing pain, disability, and loss...
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim for past and future loss of earnings and general damages is upheld.
Orders
- The defendant will provide the plaintiff with an undertaking in terms of section 17(4)(a) of the Road Accident Fund Act, 56 of 1996.
- Defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff R1,257,351.30.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment