Rachwall v Road Accident Fund (15741/2015) [2016] ZAGPPHC 481 (21 June 2016)
The court found that the plaintiff would have eventually completed her M+4 qualification, but not within the envisaged four years. A period of five years was allowed for completion, considering her academic record and personal circumstances. The court held that a 20% contingency deduction for future loss of income was appropriate, rather than the 15% proposed by the plaintiff, due to uncertainties regarding her academic progress and employment prospects. The court accepted the uncontested 5% contingency for past loss of income. The total amount awarded comprised past loss of income of R379,885.00 and future loss of income of R2,308,255.00, resulting in a total award of R2,688,140.00.
- Citation
- [2016] ZAGPPHC 481
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Coenraad Amine Rachwall; Defendant: Road Accident Fund
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 21 June 2016
- Case Number
- 15741/2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trial / Quantum of Damages After Liability Admitted
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim for loss of earnings succeeds.
- Judges
- TS Madima
- Legal Topics
- Road Accident Fund Act, Loss of Earnings, Contingency Deductions, Actuarial Calculation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Coenraad Amine Rachwall
Plaintiff
Road Accident Fund
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Quantum of Damages After Liability Admitted
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff would have completed her M+4 qualification and worked until age 65 but for the accident.
- 2 What contingency deductions are appropriate for past and future loss of earnings.
- 3 How to calculate the quantum of damages for loss of earnings in light of the plaintiff's academic and employment prospects.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff would have eventually completed her M+4 qualification, but not within the envisaged four years. A period of five years was allowed for completion, considering her academic record and personal circumstances. The court held that a 20% contingency deduction for future loss of income was appropriate, rather than the 15% proposed by the plaintiff, due to uncertainties regarding her academic progress and employment prospects. The court accepted the uncontested 5% contingency for past loss of income. The total amount awarded comprised past loss of income of R379,885.00 and future loss of income of R2,308,255.00, resulting in a total award of R2,688,140.00.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim for loss of earnings succeeds.
Orders
- The defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff the amount of R2,688,140.00.
- The defendant is ordered to pay the costs of the action, including the preparation and reservation fees of the plaintiff's experts.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment