Radebe Obo TD v Road Accident Fund (77426/2009) [2013] ZAGPPHC 84 (18 March 2013)

Radebe Obo TD v Road Accident Fund (77426/2009) [2013] ZAGPPHC 84 (18 March 2013)

The court accepted the expert evidence that the minor suffered severe, permanent brain injury resulting in significant loss of amenities, independence, and enjoyment of life, as well as chronic pain and increased risk of epilepsy. The court found that previous awards for similar injuries were only a guide and determined that R800,000 was fair and just for general damages. Regarding future loss of income, the court accepted that the minor had pre-existing learning difficulties but would likely have completed grade 12 and entered the job market. Given the total destruction of his employment prospects due to the accident, the court set a contingency deduction of 15%, resulting in an award of...

Citation
[2013] ZAGPPHC 84
Parties
Plaintiff: Radebe, Julia obo TD; Defendant: Road Accident Fund
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
18 March 2013
Case Number
77426/2009
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Quantum Determination After Liability Conceded
Outcome
Plaintiff's claim for general damages and future loss of income is upheld. Defendant is ordered to pay the capital amounts, costs, and provide statutory undertakings. A trust is to be established for the minor's benefit.
Judges
Kubushi
Legal Topics
Road Accident Fund Act, Personal Injury, General Damages, Loss of Earning Capacity, Contingency Deductions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Radebe, Julia obo TD

Plaintiff

Road Accident Fund

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trial / Quantum Determination After Liability Conceded

  1. 1 What is the appropriate quantum for general damages for the minor's severe brain injury?
  2. 2 What is the correct contingency deduction for prospective loss of income?
  3. 3 Should a trust be established for the administration of the minor's award?

Ratio Decidendi

The court accepted the expert evidence that the minor suffered severe, permanent brain injury resulting in significant loss of amenities, independence, and enjoyment of life, as well as chronic pain and increased risk of epilepsy. The court found that previous awards for similar injuries were only a guide and determined that R800,000 was fair and just for general damages. Regarding future loss of income, the court accepted that the minor had pre-existing learning difficulties but would likely have completed grade 12 and entered the job market. Given the total destruction of his employment prospects due to the accident, the court set a contingency deduction of 15%, resulting in an award of...

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's claim for general damages and future loss of income is upheld. Defendant is ordered to pay the capital amounts, costs, and provide statutory undertakings. A trust is to be established for the minor's benefit.

Orders

  • Defendant is ordered to pay R800,000 to the Plaintiff for general damages.
  • Defendant is ordered to pay R2,142,108 to the Plaintiff for future loss of earnings.