Radebe v Road Accident Fund (2012/10855) [2013] ZAGPJHC 135 (9 May 2013)
The court found that the plaintiff had established a valid customary marriage to the deceased, satisfying all legal requirements. The evidence showed that the deceased supported the plaintiff and their minor children, and his death resulted in a loss of support. Although the plaintiff's evidence regarding the deceased's income may have been exaggerated, the defendant failed to present any evidence to the contrary. The court applied increased contingency deductions to account for uncertainties in the plaintiff's evidence and adjusted the quantum accordingly. The burial costs were conceded by the defendant. The court expressed strong disapproval of the defendant's litigation conduct and...
- Citation
- [2013] ZAGPJHC 135
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Molly Khabonina Radebe; Defendant: Road Accident Fund
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 9 May 2013
- Case Number
- 2012/10855
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trial / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff; damages and costs awarded.
- Judges
- Miltz
- Legal Topics
- Loss of Support, Customary Marriage, Quantification of Damages, Contingency Deductions, Burial Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Molly Khabonina Radebe
Plaintiff
Road Accident Fund
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff was validly married to the deceased under customary law.
- 2 Whether the plaintiff and her minor children suffered loss of support due to the deceased's death.
- 3 How the quantum of damages for loss of support should be calculated.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff had established a valid customary marriage to the deceased, satisfying all legal requirements. The evidence showed that the deceased supported the plaintiff and their minor children, and his death resulted in a loss of support. Although the plaintiff's evidence regarding the deceased's income may have been exaggerated, the defendant failed to present any evidence to the contrary. The court applied increased contingency deductions to account for uncertainties in the plaintiff's evidence and adjusted the quantum accordingly. The burial costs were conceded by the defendant. The court expressed strong disapproval of the defendant's litigation conduct and...
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff; damages and costs awarded.
Orders
- The defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff the amount of R998 062.00 together with interest at 15.5% per annum from 14 days after judgment to date of payment.
- The defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff's costs of suit on the attorney and client scale, including the qualifying and other taxable costs of the actuary Gerard W Jacobson.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment