Ramdass N.O. and Others v Ethekwini Municipality and Others (11971/2013) [2014] ZAKZDHC 27 (17 June 2014)
The court found that the applicants were afforded an adequate opportunity to inspect the building plans and submit objections, and that their entitlement to a hearing was satisfied by the invitation extended by the local authority. The main objection regarding derogation of property value was rejected, as the risk of view obstruction was already discounted in market value and the building complied with legal restrictions. The technical objections regarding coverage, garden space, building lines, boundary walls, and sewer pipe dimensions were found to be either without merit or not materially affecting the applicants. The delegation of functions by the building control officer was properly...
- Citation
- [2014] ZAKZDHC 27
- Parties
- Applicant: Shahir Ramdass N.O.; Applicant: Aarthi Ramdass N.O.; Applicant: Vinesh Ramdass N.O.; Applicant: Yaseen Kahn; Applicant: Reyaaz Jacobs; Applicant: David McNaught; Applicant: Max Miller; Respondent: Ethekwini Municipality; Respondent: Hugo Eunomy van der Walt N.O.; Respondent: Tasleem Sayed N.O.; Respondent: Taahir Sayed N.O.
- Court
- Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Durban
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 17 June 2014
- Case Number
- 11971/2013
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment After Hearing on 21 May 2014
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs, including those consequent on the employment of senior counsel and, where applicable, two counsel. Costs reserved by Vahed J included.
- Judges
- Ploos van Amstel
- Legal Topics
- Building Plan Approval, National Building Regulations, Procedural Fairness, Delegation of Powers, Town Planning Scheme, Judicial Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shahir Ramdass N.O.
Applicant
Aarthi Ramdass N.O.
Applicant
Vinesh Ramdass N.O.
Applicant
Yaseen Kahn
Applicant
Reyaaz Jacobs
Applicant
David McNaught
Applicant
Max Miller
Applicant
Ethekwini Municipality
Respondent
Hugo Eunomy van der Walt N.O.
Respondent
Tasleem Sayed N.O.
Respondent
Taahir Sayed N.O.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment After Hearing on 21 May 2014
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the approval of building plans by the local authority complied with statutory requirements.
- 2 Whether the applicants were afforded a proper hearing before approval of the plans.
- 3 Whether the building control officer and his delegate were properly authorised.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants were afforded an adequate opportunity to inspect the building plans and submit objections, and that their entitlement to a hearing was satisfied by the invitation extended by the local authority. The main objection regarding derogation of property value was rejected, as the risk of view obstruction was already discounted in market value and the building complied with legal restrictions. The technical objections regarding coverage, garden space, building lines, boundary walls, and sewer pipe dimensions were found to be either without merit or not materially affecting the applicants. The delegation of functions by the building control officer was properly...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs, including those consequent on the employment of senior counsel and, where applicable, two counsel. Costs reserved by Vahed J included.
Orders
- The application is dismissed with costs, including those consequent on the employment of senior counsel and, where applicable, two counsel.
- Such costs will include those reserved by Vahed J.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment