Ramsay Son and Parker (Pty) Ltd v Media 24 Ltd and Another (4656/04) [2005] ZAWCHC 8; 2008 BIP 149 (C) (26 January 2005)
The court found that 'Wegbreek' is a close translation of 'Getaway' and conveys the same concept, which is significant in a multilingual country. The evidence of actual confusion among consumers, including references to 'Wegbreek' as the Afrikaans version of 'Getaway', supported the likelihood of deception or...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2005] ZAWCHC 8
- Parties
- Applicant: Ramsay, Son and Parker (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Media 24 Ltd; Respondent: New Media Publishing (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 26 January 2005
- Case Number
- 4656/04
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted; respondents interdicted from infringing trade mark and passing off; counter-application dismissed; costs awarded to applicant.
- Judges
- A.M. Motala
- Legal Topics
- Trade Mark Infringement, Passing Off, Disclaimer of Trade Mark, Estoppel, Acquiescence
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ramsay, Son and Parker (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Media 24 Ltd
Respondent
New Media Publishing (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether respondents' use of the mark 'Wegbreek' infringes applicant's registered trade mark 'Getaway'.
- 2 Whether the respondents' conduct amounts to passing off their magazine as associated with the applicant's 'Getaway' magazine.
- 3 Whether the applicant acquiesced in or is estopped from objecting to respondents' use of 'Wegbreek'.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that 'Wegbreek' is a close translation of 'Getaway' and conveys the same concept, which is significant in a multilingual country. The evidence of actual confusion among consumers, including references to 'Wegbreek' as the Afrikaans version of 'Getaway', supported the likelihood of deception or confusion. The similarities in content, format, and target market between the two magazines reinforced the finding of trade mark infringement and passing off. The applicant's failure to object immediately did not amount to acquiescence or estoppel, as there was no unequivocal indication of acceptance and no detrimental reliance by respondents. The request for a disclaimer was...
Court Disposition
Application granted; respondents interdicted from infringing trade mark and passing off; counter-application dismissed; costs awarded to applicant.
Orders
- First and Second Respondents are interdicted from infringing the Applicant's rights acquired by the registration of Trademark No 92/0456 GETAWAY, including use of the mark 'WEGBREEK'.
- First and Second Respondents are interdicted from passing off their business or products as those of 'GETAWAY' or any confusingly similar mark, including 'WEGBREEK'.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment