Rand Water v Tshabalala and Others (LCC50/05) [2007] ZALCC 3 (16 February 2007)
The court found that the respondent's right of residence was contractually and statutorily linked to his employment, which was lawfully terminated following a finding of theft and a fair dismissal process confirmed by the CCMA. All procedural requirements under ESTA, including proper notice to the respondent, municipality, and Department of Land Affairs, were satisfied. The respondent and his family have occupied the property for over two years without paying rent or utilities, and their continued occupation impedes the applicant's farming operations and deprives other employees of housing. While the respondent's personal circumstances were considered, the court held that indefinite...
- Citation
- [2007] ZALCC 3
- Parties
- Applicant: Rand Water; Respondent: Paulus Alexander Tshabalala; Respondent: Anna Tshabalala; Respondent: Letta Tshabalala
- Court
- Land Claims Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 16 February 2007
- Case Number
- LCC50/05
- Procedural Posture
- Eviction Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Eviction order granted; respondent and all who derive occupation from him must vacate the property by 15 May 2007. Eviction to be carried out on 31 May 2007 if property not vacated. Applicant to pay any outstanding wages or related amounts due to respondent. No order as to costs.
- Judges
- JM Pienaar
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Security of Tenure Act, Termination of Employment, Eviction Procedure, Outstanding Wages, Just and Equitable Eviction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rand Water
Applicant
Paulus Alexander Tshabalala
Respondent
Anna Tshabalala
Respondent
Letta Tshabalala
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Eviction Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the requirements for eviction under the Extension of Security of Tenure Act have been met.
- 2 Whether the termination of the respondent's right of residence was just and equitable.
- 3 Whether outstanding wages or related amounts are due to the respondent.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondent's right of residence was contractually and statutorily linked to his employment, which was lawfully terminated following a finding of theft and a fair dismissal process confirmed by the CCMA. All procedural requirements under ESTA, including proper notice to the respondent, municipality, and Department of Land Affairs, were satisfied. The respondent and his family have occupied the property for over two years without paying rent or utilities, and their continued occupation impedes the applicant's farming operations and deprives other employees of housing. While the respondent's personal circumstances were considered, the court held that indefinite...
Court Disposition
Eviction order granted; respondent and all who derive occupation from him must vacate the property by 15 May 2007. Eviction to be carried out on 31 May 2007 if property not vacated. Applicant to pay any outstanding wages or related amounts due to respondent. No order as to costs.
Orders
- The eviction order is granted.
- The respondent and all who derive occupation from him are ordered to vacate the house currently being occupied by them on or before 15 May 2007.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment