Rappa Resources (Pty) Ltd v Commissioner of the South African Revenue Service (21/21045) [2021] ZAGPJHC 555 (16 September 2021)
The court held that the applicant is entitled to the record of proceedings underlying the VAT assessments issued by the respondent, as provided for under rule 53(1)(b) and supported by constitutional rights. The respondent's objections regarding the necessity of a directive under section 105 of the Tax Administration Act and the alleged prematurity of the review application are matters for determination in the main review application, not at this interlocutory stage. The court found it inappropriate to decide complex jurisdictional issues or the merits of the review before the applicant has had the opportunity to supplement its papers after receiving the record. The respondent is directed...
- Citation
- [2021] ZAGPJHC 555
- Parties
- Applicant: Rappa Resources (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Commissioner of the South African Revenue Service
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 16 September 2021
- Case Number
- 21/21045
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Interlocutory Application to Compel Production of Record Under Rule 53
- Outcome
- Application granted. The applicant's notice of motion is amended, the respondent is directed to produce the record, and costs are awarded to the applicant.
- Judges
- E F Dippenaar
- Legal Topics
- Tax Administration Act, Promotion of Administrative Justice Act, Compelling Production of Record, Jurisdiction of High Court, Exhaustion of Internal Remedies, Review of Administrative Action
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rappa Resources (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Commissioner of the South African Revenue Service
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Interlocutory Application to Compel Production of Record Under Rule 53
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to the record of proceedings underlying the VAT assessments issued by the respondent.
- 2 Whether a directive under section 105 of the Tax Administration Act is necessary for the High Court to hear the review application.
- 3 Whether the respondent may refuse to produce the record on the basis that the review application is allegedly flawed or premature.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the applicant is entitled to the record of proceedings underlying the VAT assessments issued by the respondent, as provided for under rule 53(1)(b) and supported by constitutional rights. The respondent's objections regarding the necessity of a directive under section 105 of the Tax Administration Act and the alleged prematurity of the review application are matters for determination in the main review application, not at this interlocutory stage. The court found it inappropriate to decide complex jurisdictional issues or the merits of the review before the applicant has had the opportunity to supplement its papers after receiving the record. The respondent is directed...
Court Disposition
Application granted. The applicant's notice of motion is amended, the respondent is directed to produce the record, and costs are awarded to the applicant.
Orders
- The applicant's notice of motion is amended to include prayer 1 regarding section 105 of the Tax Administration Act.
- Relief sought in prayer 1 concerning section 105 is postponed sine die, to be heard with the main review application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment