Raubex Construction (Pty) Ltd v Bryte Insurance Company Ltd (337/2018) [2019] ZASCA 14; [2019] 2 All SA 322 (SCA) (20 March 2019)

Raubex Construction (Pty) Ltd v Bryte Insurance Company Ltd (337/2018) [2019] ZASCA 14; [2019] 2 All SA 322 (SCA) (20 March 2019)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the retention guarantee issued by Bryte Insurance was unconditional and covered all defects and incomplete work, regardless of when they manifested. The guarantee was a separate contract, and Bryte was obliged to pay upon a compliant demand unless fraud was proven. The court found that Bryte failed to discharge the onus of proving fraud, as its allegations were unsupported by facts and did not demonstrate bad faith or knowledge of incorrectness on Raubex's part. The inclusion of salaries and other costs in Raubex's estimation did not amount to fraud, as Raubex was entitled to recover legitimate expenses incurred in remedying breaches. The court...

Citation
[2019] ZASCA 14
Parties
Appellant: Raubex Construction (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Bryte Insurance Company Ltd
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
20 March 2019
Case Number
337/2018
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Gauteng Division of the High Court, Johannesburg
Outcome
Appeal upheld; Bryte Insurance held liable under the retention guarantee.
Judges
Leach, Swain, Mathopo, Makgoka, Eksteen
Legal Topics
Construction Contracts, Retention Guarantee, Fraud in Commercial Claims, Contractual Interpretation
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Construction Contracts Retention Guarantee Fraud in Commercial Claims Contractual Interpretation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Raubex Construction (Pty) Ltd

Appellant

Bryte Insurance Company Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Gauteng Division of the High Court, Johannesburg

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the retention guarantee issued by Bryte Insurance covered all defects or only those arising after the certificate of completion.
  2. 2 Whether Raubex's demand for payment under the guarantee was fraudulent.
  3. 3 Whether Bryte Insurance was liable to pay under the guarantee given the alleged fraud.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the retention guarantee issued by Bryte Insurance was unconditional and covered all defects and incomplete work, regardless of when they manifested. The guarantee was a separate contract, and Bryte was obliged to pay upon a compliant demand unless fraud was proven. The court found that Bryte failed to discharge the onus of proving fraud, as its allegations were unsupported by facts and did not demonstrate bad faith or knowledge of incorrectness on Raubex's part. The inclusion of salaries and other costs in Raubex's estimation did not amount to fraud, as Raubex was entitled to recover legitimate expenses incurred in remedying breaches. The court...

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld; Bryte Insurance held liable under the retention guarantee.

Orders

  • The appeal is allowed, with costs.
  • The order of the court a quo is set aside and replaced with: 'The appeal is dismissed, with costs.'