Raubex/Nodoli Construction Joint Venture v MEC: Free State Department of Police, Roads and Transport (2288/2022) [2023] ZAFSHC 56 (20 February 2023)
The court held that the adjudicator's award under the NEC3 contract is binding and enforceable as a contractual obligation unless and until revised by the tribunal. The referral of the dispute to arbitration does not suspend the obligation to pay the amounts awarded by the adjudicator. The Supreme Court of Appeal in Framatome v Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd clarified that adjudication awards must be enforced pending arbitration, and the absence of 'promptly' or 'without undue delay' wording in the NEC3 clause does not affect this principle. The respondent did not challenge the adjudicator's jurisdiction or the scope of the award, and therefore the award stands. The application for enforcement...
- Citation
- [2023] ZAFSHC 56
- Parties
- Applicant: Raubex/Nodoli Construction Joint Venture; Respondent: MEC: Free State Department of Police, Roads and Transport, Free State Provincial Government N.O.
- Court
- Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 20 February 2023
- Case Number
- 2288/2022
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Application to Enforce Adjudication Award Pending Arbitration
- Outcome
- Application granted; adjudicator's award enforced.
- Judges
- C Reinders
- Legal Topics
- Construction Contracts, Adjudication Award Enforcement, Dispute Resolution Clauses, Arbitration Pending, Contractual Obligation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Raubex/Nodoli Construction Joint Venture
Applicant
MEC: Free State Department of Police, Roads and Transport, Free State Provincial Government N.O.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application to Enforce Adjudication Award Pending Arbitration
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the adjudication award under the NEC3 contract is binding and enforceable pending arbitration.
- 2 Whether the respondent is obliged to pay the amounts awarded by the adjudicator despite referring the dispute to arbitration.
- 3 Whether the absence of 'promptly' or 'without undue delay' wording in the NEC3 clause affects enforceability of the adjudicator's decision.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the adjudicator's award under the NEC3 contract is binding and enforceable as a contractual obligation unless and until revised by the tribunal. The referral of the dispute to arbitration does not suspend the obligation to pay the amounts awarded by the adjudicator. The Supreme Court of Appeal in Framatome v Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd clarified that adjudication awards must be enforced pending arbitration, and the absence of 'promptly' or 'without undue delay' wording in the NEC3 clause does not affect this principle. The respondent did not challenge the adjudicator's jurisdiction or the scope of the award, and therefore the award stands. The application for enforcement...
Court Disposition
Application granted; adjudicator's award enforced.
Orders
- The respondent is forthwith to give effect to the adjudication award of Adv. A Gautschi SC dated 5 April 2022 and handed down on 7 April 2022.
- The respondent is ordered to pay the applicant R14,280,737.40 plus VAT less R8,222,621.10, in other words R8,200,229.91.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment