Raudev (Pty) v Emerging Markets Home Loans Two (Pty) Ltd and Others (A141/20; 75566/17) [2021] ZAGPPHC 680 (7 October 2021)
The court found that the spalling in the units was caused by a latent defect in the bricks, not the plasterwork, as confirmed by expert evidence and Raudev's own admissions. The Agreement required Raudev to expeditiously remedy latent defects upon written notice from Emerging Markets. The correspondence between the parties did not create a new contract or vary the original Agreement; it merely invoked the breach clause. Raudev's undertaking to remedy the defects was not conditional, and any attempt to link it to the release of retention monies or the appointment of its own engineer was external to the Agreement. The order for specific performance and, alternatively, cancellation and...
- Citation
- [2021] ZAGPPHC 680
- Parties
- Appellant: Raudev (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Emerging Markets Home Loans Two (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: The Body Corporate of the Piccolo Close Sectional Title Scheme
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 7 October 2021
- Case Number
- A141/20; 75566/17
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Judgment and Order of Baqwa J
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs, save that paragraph 4 of the order of Baqwa J is struck out.
- Judges
- Neukircher, Van Der Westhuizen, Van Der Schyff
- Legal Topics
- Latent Defects, Specific Performance, Contractual Remedies, Sectional Title Scheme, Damages, Joinder of Parties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Raudev (Pty) Ltd
Appellant
Emerging Markets Home Loans Two (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
The Body Corporate of the Piccolo Close Sectional Title Scheme
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Judgment and Order of Baqwa J
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Raudev is liable to remedy latent defects in the units sold to Emerging Markets under the Agreement.
- 2 Whether the correspondence between the parties constituted a new contract or varied the original Agreement.
- 3 Whether Raudev's undertaking to remedy defects was conditional.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the spalling in the units was caused by a latent defect in the bricks, not the plasterwork, as confirmed by expert evidence and Raudev's own admissions. The Agreement required Raudev to expeditiously remedy latent defects upon written notice from Emerging Markets. The correspondence between the parties did not create a new contract or vary the original Agreement; it merely invoked the breach clause. Raudev's undertaking to remedy the defects was not conditional, and any attempt to link it to the release of retention monies or the appointment of its own engineer was external to the Agreement. The order for specific performance and, alternatively, cancellation and...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs, save that paragraph 4 of the order of Baqwa J is struck out.
Orders
- Paragraph 4 of the order of Baqwa J of 17 October 2019 is struck out.
- The appeal is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment