Reddy and Others v Minister of Human Settlemens, Water and Sanitation and Others (5167/2020) [2021] ZAKZPHC 100 (21 October 2021)
The court found that the Minister's power to appoint and terminate Board members is sourced from the Water Services Act, not the Constitution, making the decision administrative action subject to PAJA. The Minister failed to apply the audi alteram partem principle, as the Board members were not given notice or an...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] ZAKZPHC 100
- Parties
- Applicant: Visvin Gopal Reddy; Applicant: Siboniso Shabalala; Applicant: William Mapena; Applicant: Teboho Nkhahle; Applicant: Nompumelelo Chamane; Applicant: Mbali Thulile Barbara Ndlovu; Applicant: Simosenkosi Wiseman Chamane; Applicant: Suleman Sadat; Applicant: Thandwa Zizwe Mthembu; Respondent: Minister of Human Settlements, Water and Sanitation; Respondent: Members of the Interim Board listed in Annexure "A"; Respondent: Umgeni Water
- Court
- Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Pietermaritzburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 21 October 2021
- Case Number
- 5167/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Final Judgment on Merits
- Outcome
- Application granted. The Minister's decisions to terminate the Board and appoint the interim Board are declared unlawful and set aside.
- Judges
- Bezuidenhout
- Legal Topics
- Promotion of Administrative Justice Act, Audi Alteram Partem, Ministerial Discretion, Termination of Board Membership, Legality Review
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Visvin Gopal Reddy
Applicant
Siboniso Shabalala
Applicant
William Mapena
Applicant
Teboho Nkhahle
Applicant
Nompumelelo Chamane
Applicant
Mbali Thulile Barbara Ndlovu
Applicant
Simosenkosi Wiseman Chamane
Applicant
Suleman Sadat
Applicant
Thandwa Zizwe Mthembu
Applicant
Minister of Human Settlements, Water and Sanitation
Respondent
Members of the Interim Board listed in Annexure "A"
Respondent
Umgeni Water
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Final Judgment on Merits
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Minister's decision to terminate the appointments of Umgeni Water Board members was lawful and reviewable.
- 2 Whether the Minister's decision constituted administrative or executive action.
- 3 Whether the audi alteram partem principle was violated in the termination process.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Minister's power to appoint and terminate Board members is sourced from the Water Services Act, not the Constitution, making the decision administrative action subject to PAJA. The Minister failed to apply the audi alteram partem principle, as the Board members were not given notice or an opportunity to make submissions before their appointments were terminated. The only reason provided for termination was lack of Cabinet approval, which is not a statutory requirement under the Water Services Act. The appointment of the interim Board was also not approved by Cabinet and not provided for in the Act. Even if the decision were considered a legality review, the...
Court Disposition
Application granted. The Minister's decisions to terminate the Board and appoint the interim Board are declared unlawful and set aside.
Orders
- The First Respondent's decision communicated on 3 August 2020 to disband Umgeni Water Board is declared unlawful and reviewed and set aside.
- The decision of the First Respondent to appoint an interim Board is declared unlawful and reviewed and set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment