Redefine Properties Limited v Hyprop Investment Limited in Respect of Stoneridge Shopping Centre (020628) [2015] ZACT 27 (24 March 2015)
The Tribunal found that the relevant market is the market for rentable retail space, specifically value centres within a 15km radius of Stoneridge Shopping Centre. Redefine does not own any value centres and will be a new entrant, resulting in no overlaps between the parties' activities. The Commission's investigation confirmed that comparative centres, such as the Freeway Centre, are not viable alternatives to Stoneridge. Therefore, the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition. Furthermore, no public interest concerns were identified. The Tribunal agreed with the Commission's analysis and unconditionally approved the merger.
- Citation
- [2015] ZACT 27
- Parties
- Applicant: Redefine Properties Limited; Respondent: Hyprop Investments Limited
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 24 March 2015
- Case Number
- 020628
- Procedural Posture
- Merger Approval / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Merger unconditionally approved.
- Judges
- Medi Mokuena, Anton Roskam, Imraan Valodia
- Legal Topics
- Merger Control, Substantial Lessening of Competition, Public Interest Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Redefine Properties Limited
Applicant
Hyprop Investments Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Merger Approval / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed acquisition of Stoneridge Shopping Centre by Redefine Properties Limited is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in the relevant market.
- 2 Whether any public interest concerns arise from the proposed transaction.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the relevant market is the market for rentable retail space, specifically value centres within a 15km radius of Stoneridge Shopping Centre. Redefine does not own any value centres and will be a new entrant, resulting in no overlaps between the parties' activities. The Commission's investigation confirmed that comparative centres, such as the Freeway Centre, are not viable alternatives to Stoneridge. Therefore, the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition. Furthermore, no public interest concerns were identified. The Tribunal agreed with the Commission's analysis and unconditionally approved the merger.
Court Disposition
Merger unconditionally approved.
Orders
- The merger between Redefine Properties Limited and Hyprop Investments Limited in respect of Stoneridge Shopping Centre is approved without conditions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment