Redefine Properties Limited v Setso Property Fund (Pty) Ltd (LM070Jul22) [2022] ZACT 78 (30 August 2022)
The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction results in a horizontal product overlap, as both merging parties own Grade P office properties. However, there is no geographic overlap, since Redefine does not own Grade P office space in Vorna Valley, Midrand, where the target property is located. The Commission and Tribunal found no evidence of a pre-existing relationship or vertical overlap. No third parties raised concerns, and the Tribunal concluded that the transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market. Regarding public interest, the transaction will not result in retrenchments, and the dilution of HDP shareholding is not significant given...
- Citation
- [2022] ZACT 78
- Parties
- Applicant: Redefine Properties Limited; Respondent: Setso Property Fund (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 30 August 2022
- Case Number
- LM070Jul22
- Procedural Posture
- Merger Approval / Final Decision
- Outcome
- The merger is approved unconditionally.
- Judges
- Imraan I. Valodia, Yasmin Carrim, Vilakazi Thando
- Legal Topics
- Large Merger, Horizontal Overlap, Public Interest, Spread of Ownership, Employment Effects
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Redefine Properties Limited
Applicant
Setso Property Fund (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Merger Approval / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed acquisition of a one-third undivided share in Hertford Office Park by Redefine Properties Limited from Setso Property Fund (Pty) Ltd is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market.
- 2 Whether the transaction raises any public interest concerns, including effects on employment and the spread of ownership.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction results in a horizontal product overlap, as both merging parties own Grade P office properties. However, there is no geographic overlap, since Redefine does not own Grade P office space in Vorna Valley, Midrand, where the target property is located. The Commission and Tribunal found no evidence of a pre-existing relationship or vertical overlap. No third parties raised concerns, and the Tribunal concluded that the transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market. Regarding public interest, the transaction will not result in retrenchments, and the dilution of HDP shareholding is not significant given...
Court Disposition
The merger is approved unconditionally.
Orders
- The large merger between Redefine Properties Limited and Setso Property Fund (Pty) Ltd is approved without conditions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment