Redefine (Pty) Ltd v Annuity Properties Ltd Annuity Assets managers (Pty) Ltd And Annuity Property Managers (Pty) Ltd (018754) [2014] ZACT 14 (2 July 2014)

Redefine (Pty) Ltd v Annuity Properties Ltd Annuity Assets managers (Pty) Ltd And Annuity Property Managers (Pty) Ltd (018754) [2014] ZACT 14 (2 July 2014)

The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction resulted in only minimal increases in market share across the relevant nodes for rentable A-Grade office and light industrial properties. Sufficient credible competitors remained in each market, and available office space would constrain the merged entity from unilaterally increasing rental prices. The transaction did not result in foreclosure in asset or property management services, as these services were provided exclusively to the merging parties. Regarding public interest, the Tribunal noted that no employees from Annuity Property Management would be retrenched, and only four employees from Annuity Asset Managers would be affected,...

Citation
[2014] ZACT 14
Parties
Applicant: Redefine (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Annuity Properties Ltd; Respondent: Annuity Assets Managers (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Annuity Property Managers (Pty) Ltd
Court
Competition Tribunal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
2 July 2014
Case Number
018754
Procedural Posture
Merger Approval / Final Decision
Outcome
The merger is approved unconditionally.
Judges
T Madima, F Tregenna, A Roskam
Legal Topics
Merger Control, Market Share Analysis, Public Interest, Employment Effects

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Redefine (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

Annuity Properties Ltd

Respondent

Annuity Assets Managers (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Annuity Property Managers (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Merger Approval / Final Decision

  1. 1 Whether the proposed merger will substantially prevent or lessen competition in the relevant property markets.
  2. 2 Whether the transaction raises any public interest concerns, including effects on employment.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction resulted in only minimal increases in market share across the relevant nodes for rentable A-Grade office and light industrial properties. Sufficient credible competitors remained in each market, and available office space would constrain the merged entity from unilaterally increasing rental prices. The transaction did not result in foreclosure in asset or property management services, as these services were provided exclusively to the merging parties. Regarding public interest, the Tribunal noted that no employees from Annuity Property Management would be retrenched, and only four employees from Annuity Asset Managers would be affected,...

Court Disposition

The merger is approved unconditionally.

Orders

  • The proposed transaction is approved without conditions.