Refusal by supplier to sell at the displayed price: display price binding (20131118951) [2014] ZACGSO 14 (1 July 2014)
The supplier is bound by the displayed price once the consumer indicates acceptance by placing the goods on the counter or otherwise communicating acceptance. Section 23(6) of the Consumer Protection Act prohibits charging more than the lowest displayed price, and section 23(9) only allows the supplier to escape this obligation if the error is corrected and reasonable steps are taken to inform consumers before the transaction is concluded. In this case, the supplier only became aware of the error after the consumer had indicated acceptance, and the requirements of section 23(9) were not met in time. The common law defence of 'snatching a bargain' is no longer available, as the CPA...
- Citation
- [2014] ZACGSO 14
- Parties
- Applicant: Complainant; Respondent: Supplier
- Court
- Consumer Goods and Services Ombud
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 1 July 2014
- Case Number
- 20131118951
- Procedural Posture
- Consumer Complaint / Adjudication
- Outcome
- The supplier is bound by the displayed price and should honour the incorrect price, but the complainant withdrew her claim after acknowledging she queried the price before acceptance.
- Judges
- N Melville
- Legal Topics
- Displayed Price Binding, Consumer Protection Act, Offer and Acceptance, Unilateral Mistake, Invitation to Treat
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Complainant
Applicant
Supplier
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Consumer Complaint / Adjudication
Legal Issues
- 1 Is a supplier bound to sell goods at the price displayed when the consumer indicates acceptance?
- 2 Does section 23(9) of the Consumer Protection Act allow a supplier to refuse to honour an obvious pricing error after the consumer has accepted the displayed price?
- 3 Has the common law defence of 'snatching a bargain' been displaced by the CPA provisions?
Ratio Decidendi
The supplier is bound by the displayed price once the consumer indicates acceptance by placing the goods on the counter or otherwise communicating acceptance. Section 23(6) of the Consumer Protection Act prohibits charging more than the lowest displayed price, and section 23(9) only allows the supplier to escape this obligation if the error is corrected and reasonable steps are taken to inform consumers before the transaction is concluded. In this case, the supplier only became aware of the error after the consumer had indicated acceptance, and the requirements of section 23(9) were not met in time. The common law defence of 'snatching a bargain' is no longer available, as the CPA...
Court Disposition
The supplier is bound by the displayed price and should honour the incorrect price, but the complainant withdrew her claim after acknowledging she queried the price before acceptance.
Orders
- The supplier should honour the displayed price of R485.00 for the Nespresso Latissima Machine, but the complaint is closed as the complainant withdrew her claim.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment