Representation Investment (Pty) Ltd and Another v New Diamond Corporation (Pty) Ltd and Another (1058/2010) [2010] ZANCHC 62 (12 November 2010)
The court found that the Fonteintjie Community Development Trust has a real and substantial interest in the subject matter and outcome of the application, based on statutory, constitutional, and contractual rights relating to the land and its rehabilitation. The Trust's residual rights are not extinguished by the registration of the SCPA as owner, and the absence of representation on the SCPA committee does not deprive the Trust or its members of locus standi. Both applicants established the requirements for an interim interdict: a prima facie right, irreparable harm, balance of convenience, and no alternative remedy. The off-take agreement remains enforceable, as Ministerial consent...
- Citation
- [2010] ZANCHC 62
- Parties
- Applicant: Representation Investment (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: The Fonteintjie Community Development Trust; Respondent: New Diamond Corporation (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: The Honourable Minister of Minerals & Energy
- Court
- Northern Cape High Court, Kimberley
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 12 November 2010
- Case Number
- 1058/2010
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Interim Interdict and Intervention Application
- Outcome
- Interim interdict granted; intervention application granted; costs reserved.
- Judges
- Lacock R
- Legal Topics
- Prospecting Rights, Interim Interdict, Locus Standi, Cession of Rights, Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act, Companies Act Section 228
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Representation Investment (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
The Fonteintjie Community Development Trust
Applicant
New Diamond Corporation (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
The Honourable Minister of Minerals & Energy
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Interim Interdict and Intervention Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Fonteintjie Community Development Trust has locus standi to intervene in the proceedings.
- 2 Whether the applicants are entitled to an interim interdict restraining the cession of the prospecting right pending final determination of legal proceedings.
- 3 Whether the off-take agreement between Representation Investment and NDC remains enforceable despite statutory and accounting objections.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Fonteintjie Community Development Trust has a real and substantial interest in the subject matter and outcome of the application, based on statutory, constitutional, and contractual rights relating to the land and its rehabilitation. The Trust's residual rights are not extinguished by the registration of the SCPA as owner, and the absence of representation on the SCPA committee does not deprive the Trust or its members of locus standi. Both applicants established the requirements for an interim interdict: a prima facie right, irreparable harm, balance of convenience, and no alternative remedy. The off-take agreement remains enforceable, as Ministerial consent...
Court Disposition
Interim interdict granted; intervention application granted; costs reserved.
Orders
- Prayer 2 of the main application is granted, interdicting and restraining the First Respondent from proceeding with the section 11 application and the Second Respondent from granting consent, pending final determination of legal proceedings or arbitration.
- Prayers 1 and 2 of the Second Applicant's application are granted, allowing the Fonteintjie Trust to intervene and granting similar interdictory relief.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment