Respublica Student Living (Pty) Ltd v Midrand Varsity Lodge (Pty) Ltd and Others (LM245Mar16) [2016] ZACT 34 (22 April 2016)
The Tribunal found that although there is a horizontal overlap in the provision of rentable residential properties for student accommodation, the merging parties' properties are located between 24 and 39 kilometers apart. This distance means there is no geographic overlap, and the properties cannot be considered...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] ZACT 34
- Parties
- Applicant: Respublica Student Living (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Midrand Varsity Lodge (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Masingita Estates (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Sam King Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 22 April 2016
- Case Number
- LM245Mar16
- Procedural Posture
- Merger Approval / Final Determination
- Outcome
- Merger approved unconditionally.
- Judges
- Y Carrim, A Ndoni, A Roskam
- Legal Topics
- Merger Control, Horizontal Overlap, Public Interest, Student Accommodation Market
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Respublica Student Living (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Midrand Varsity Lodge (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Masingita Estates (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Sam King Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Merger Approval / Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed merger would substantially prevent or lessen competition in the market for rentable residential properties used for student accommodation.
- 2 Whether the merger raises any significant public interest concerns, including adverse effects on employment.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that although there is a horizontal overlap in the provision of rentable residential properties for student accommodation, the merging parties' properties are located between 24 and 39 kilometers apart. This distance means there is no geographic overlap, and the properties cannot be considered substitutes. The Commission concluded, and the Tribunal agreed, that the merger is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in the relevant market. Furthermore, the merger raises no significant public interest concerns, as there will be no adverse effect on employment or retrenchments. The transaction was therefore approved unconditionally.
Court Disposition
Merger approved unconditionally.
Orders
- The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
53 paragraphs
COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case No: LM245Mar16
In the matter between:
Respublica Student living (Pty) Ltd
Acquiring Firm
and
Midrand Varsity Lodge (Pty) Ltd, Target Firms
Masingita Estates (Pty) Ltd and
Sam King Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd
in respect of two property letting enterprises known as Midrand Student Village
and White House Lodge
Panel
: Yasmin Carrim (Presiding Member)
Andiswa Ndoni (Tribunal Member)
Anton Roskam (Tribunal Member)
Heard on
: 22 Mqtch 2016
Order issued on
: 22 March 2016
Reasons issued on : 22 April 2016
Reasons for Decision
Approval
1. On 22 March 2016 the Competition Tribunal (the "Tribunal") unconditionally approved an acquiE)ition by Respublica Student living (Pty) Ltd ("Respublica") of Midrand Varsity Lodge (Pty) Ltd ("Midrand Varsity Lodge"), Masingita Estates (Ply) Ltd ("Masingita Estates") and Sam King Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd ("Sam King Investment") in respect of two property letting enterprises known as Midrand Student Village and White House Lodge.
2. The reasons for the approval of the proposed transaction follow.
The Parties and their activities
3. The primary acquiring firm is respublica, a firm incorporated in term of the laws of the Republic of South Africa. Respublica is controlled by Redefine Properties Ltd ("Redefine Properties") [1] and Bridgehead Real Estate Fund (Pty) Ltd ("Bridgehead"). [2]
4. Redefine Properties is listed on the Johannesburg Securities Exchange Ltd and is not controlled by any firm. As at 31 August 2015, the top five beneficial shareholders of Redefine are as follows: Government Employees Pension Fund (9.44%), State Street (Custodian) (5.76%), Star1lib Asset Management Ltd (4.33%), Redefin Empowerment Trust (7.04%) and Coronation Fund Managers Ltd (3.94%). Respublica does not control any firm. The issued share capital of Bridgehead is held by 22 shareholders. The top three shareholders of Bridgehead are: Brighthead Investments (Pty) Ltd (49.86%), Cledon Trading (Pty) Ltd (17.01%) and Hanend Properties (Ply) Ltd (10.96%).
5. Respublica owns, manages and dev:elops rentable residential properties for the purpose of student accommodation. It provides fully serviced apartment to students in Pretoria and Johannesburg. Redefine Properties owns a property portfolio comprising of office, retail and industries space throughout South Africa. Bridgehead is a property investment company that holds a limited number of properties.
6. The primary target firms are Midrand Varsity Lodge, Masingita Estates and Sam King Investment (the "sellers"), in respect of two property letting enterprises known as Midrand Student Village and White House Lodge (the "target enterprises"). The sellers invest in the construction, management and maintenance of rentable student accommodation. The target enterprises consist of rentable residential space for student accommodation and are located in Midrand, Gauteng Province.
Proposed transaction and rationale
7. In terms of the Sale of Property Portfolio Agreements, Respublica intends to acquire the target enterprises and all related immovable property, assets and lease agreements from the sellers. On completion, Respublica will have sole control over the target enterprises.
8. Respublica intends to grow its asset base in line with the forecast growth objectives for the company' business.
9. According to the sellers, the target enterprises intend to realise their marketable immovable assets and have identified Respublica as a suitable purchaser.
Competition Analysis
10. The Commission found that there is a horizontal overlap between the activities of the merging parties in relation to the provision of rentable space in residential properties used for student accommodation. In respect of the relevant geographic market, the Commission found that residential properties located more than 8 kilometers apart do not pose a competitive constraint on each other. The Commission further found that the merging parties' respective properties are located between 24 and 39 kilometers apart. Given this, the Commission is of the view that there is no geographic overlap between the activities of the merging parties as their respective properties are located too far apart to be considered as substitutes.
11. The Commission therefore concluded that that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in the market for the provision of rentable space in residential properties used for student accommodation.
Public interest
12. The merging parties confirmed that the proposed transaction will have no adverse effect on employment and will not result in any retrenchments in South Africa. The proposed transaction raises no other public interest concerns.
Conclusion
13. In light of the above, we agree with the Commission that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen
competition in the market for the provision of rentable space in residential properties used for student accommodation as there is no geographic overlap between the activities of the merging parties. Further, we agree with the Commission that proposed transaction is unlikely to result in significant public interest concerns. We therefore approved the proposed transaction unconditionally.
22 April 2016
Date
_______________________
Ms Yasmin Carrim
Ms Andiswa Ndoni and Mr. Anton Roskam concurring
Tribunal Researcher : lpeleng Selaledi
For the merging parti!fs : yani Chetty of Baker & McKenzie Attorneys
For the Commission : Reabetswe Molotsi
[1] In addition to Respublica, Redefine controls in excess of 20 firms. See record, page 16 - 17 for a list of these firms.
[2] In addition to Respublica, Bridgehead controls in excess of 7 firms. See record, pages 17 - 18
[2] In addition to Respublica, Bridgehead controls in excess of 7 firms. See record, pages 17 -
18