Download PDF

South Africa Order

Competition Tribunal

Revego Africa Energy Fund Partnership Managers v Genesis Khobab Wind (RF) (Pty) Ltd and Others (LM216Mar21) [2021] ZACT 46 (25 May 2021)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal found that the proposed merger involves the acquisition of minority interests in special purpose vehicles holding stakes in wind farm projects, with no direct or indirect control over any firm in South Africa by the acquiring group. The Competition Commission identified no horizontal or vertical overlaps between the parties. The structure of the transaction and the regulatory environment under REIPPPP ensure that the supply of electricity is for Eskom’s national grid, mitigating any risk of anti-competitive information exchange. The acquiring group will not be involved in the day-to-day management of the target firms, and neither target firm has employees, so there are no adverse employment effects. No public interest concerns were identified. The Tribunal concluded that the merger is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition or negatively impact the public interest, and therefore approved the transaction unconditionally.

Court disposition

Merger approved unconditionally.

Orders

  • The merger between Revego Africa Energy Fund Partnership Managers and Genesis Khobab Wind (RF) (Pty) Ltd, Genesis Loeriesfontein Wind (RF) (Pty) Ltd, and Genesis Noupoort Wind (RF) (Pty) Ltd is approved in terms of section 16(2)(a) of the Competition Act, 1998.
  • A Merger Clearance Certificate is to be issued in terms of Competition Tribunal Rule 35(5)(a).

02

Material facts

Parties

Revego Africa Energy Fund Partnership Managers (Pty) Ltd, an en commandite partnership, represented by Revego General Partner (RF) (Pty) Ltd

Applicant Counsel: Anton Roets and Avias Ngwenya

Genesis Khobab Wind (RF) (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Genesis Loeriesfontein Wind (RF) (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Genesis Noupoort Wind (RF) (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Merger Application / Final Determination

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant argued that the acquisition involves only minority shareholdings in special purpose vehicles holding interests in wind farm projects, with no direct or indirect control over any firm in South Africa. Revego manages third party funds and does not participate in day-to-day operations of the target firms. The transaction is part of a strategy to invest in renewable energy projects and does not create horizontal or vertical overlaps.
Respondent
The respondents did not oppose the merger and provided no evidence of competition or public interest concerns. The Competition Commission, acting as respondent, analysed the transaction and found no horizontal or vertical overlaps, no adverse employment effects, and no likelihood of information exchange concerns due to the structure and nature of the acquiring group’s interests.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act, 1998, section 16(2)(a)

    A merger may only be prohibited if it is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market, or if it raises significant public interest concerns.

  2. 02

    Competition Tribunal precedent

    Minority shareholdings that do not confer control or management involvement are unlikely to facilitate anti-competitive information exchange.

  3. 03

    REIPPPP regulatory framework

    The Renewable Energy Independent Power Producers Procurement Programme (REIPPPP) ensures that electricity supply from renewable projects is for Eskom’s national grid and subject to tender processes, reducing competitive overlap.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal found that the proposed merger involves the acquisition of minority interests in special purpose vehicles holding stakes in wind farm projects, with no direct or indirect control over any firm in South Africa by the acquiring group. The Competition Commission identified no horizontal or vertical overlaps between the parties. The structure of the transaction and the regulatory environment under REIPPPP ensure that the supply of electricity is for Eskom’s national grid, mitigating any risk of anti-competitive information exchange. The acquiring group will not be involved in the day-to-day management of the target firms, and neither target firm has employees, so there are no adverse employment effects. No public interest concerns were identified. The Tribunal concluded that the merger is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition or negatively impact the public interest, and therefore approved the transaction unconditionally.

Obiter and limits

  • The Tribunal noted that the transaction forms part of a series of renewable energy project acquisitions by Revego, but each is subject to independent competition assessment.
  • The absence of employees in the target firms means employment effects are not a relevant consideration in this case.
  • The Commission’s analysis of information exchange concerns was thorough, but the minority shareholding and lack of operational involvement by the acquiring group mitigated any risk.

Court disposition

Merger approved unconditionally.

  • The merger between Revego Africa Energy Fund Partnership Managers and Genesis Khobab Wind (RF) (Pty) Ltd, Genesis Loeriesfontein Wind (RF) (Pty) Ltd, and Genesis Noupoort Wind (RF) (Pty) Ltd is approved in terms of section 16(2)(a) of the Competition Act, 1998.
  • A Merger Clearance Certificate is to be issued in terms of Competition Tribunal Rule 35(5)(a).

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Order

[2021] ZACT 46

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

Case No.: LM216Mar21

In the matter between:

Revego Africa Energy Fund Partnership Managers Primary Acquiring Firm

(Pty) Ltd an en commandite partnership, represented

by Revego General Partner (RF) (Pty) Ltd

And

Genesis Khobab Wind (RF) (Pty) Ltd; Genesis Primary Target Firm

Loeriesfontein Wind (RF) (Pty) Ltd; and Genesis

Noupoort Wind (RF) (Pty) Ltd

Panel:

E Daniels (Presiding Member)

Y Carrim (Tribunal Panel Member) A Ndoni (Tribunal Panel Member)

Heard on:

25 May 2021

Order Issued on: 25 May 2021

Reasons Issued on: 25 May 2021

ORDER

Further to the recommendation of the Competition Commission in terms of section 14A(1)(b) of the Competition Act, 1998 (“the Act”) the Competition Tribunal orders that–

1. the merger between the abovementioned parties be approved in terms of section 16(2)(a) of the Act; and

2. a Merger Clearance Certificate be issued in terms of Competition Tribunal Rule 35(5)(a).

Presiding Member Mr Enver Daniels Date:

25 May 2021

Concurring: Ms Yasmin Carrim and Ms Andiswa Ndoni

Case no: LM216Mar21

Revego Africa Energy Fund Partnership Managers (Primary Acquiring Firm)

(Pty) Ltd, an en commandite partnership,

represented by Revego General Partner (RF) (Pty) Ltd

Genesis Khobab Wind (RF) (Pty) Ltd; Genesis Loeriesfontein (Primary Target Firms)

Wind (RF) (Pty) Ltd; and Genesis Noupoort Wind (RF) (Pty) Ltd

REASONS

FOR DECISION

[1] On 25 May 2021, the Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved a large merger between Revego Africa Energy Fund Partnership Managers (Pty) Ltd, an en commandite partnership, represented by Revego General Partner (RF) Proprietary Limited in its capacity as General Partner (“Revego”) and Genesis Khobab Wind (RF) (Pty) Ltd (“Genesis Khobab”), Genesis

Loeriesfontein Wind (RF) (Pty) Ltd (“Genesis Loeriesfontein”), and Genesis Noupoort Wind (RF) (Pty) Ltd (“Genesis Noupoort”).

[2] Revego intends to acquire 100% of the issued shares in Genesis Khobab, Genesis Loeriesfontein, and Genesis Noupoort – special purpose vehicles that solely hold a non-controlling 15% interest in wind farm projects in the Northern Cape: Project Khobab,[1]1 Project Loeriesfontein[2]2 and Project Noupoort,[3]3 respectively.

[3] Revego is wholly owned by Revego Fund Managers (Pty) Ltd (“RFM”), which is also the fund manager of the Fund Partnership and exerts management control over the Fund Partnership. Revego is ultimately controlled by Investec and does not directly or indirectly control any firm in South Africa. Revego manages third party funds and provides intermediary services on a discretionary basis. As a fund manager, Revego is responsible for the sourcing and managing of investments in operating renewable energy projects in South Africa and broader sub-Saharan Africa. The acquiring group has no other interests in renewable energy projects, nor does Revego nor RFM. However, Revego intends, through the Fund Partnership, to acquire equity instruments in several renewable energy projects.

[4] The Competition Commission found no horizontal or vertical overlaps in the activities of the merger parties.

[5] Revego intends, through the Fund Partnership, to acquire equity instruments in several renewable energy projects. In this regard, these acquisitions are the start of a series of renewable energy project acquisitions in which the Revego will invest. The Commission analysed the potential for this transaction to create information exchange concerns in light of—

a. Investec’s minor interest4 in the renewable energy project Kathu Solar Park, a 100MW Greenfield Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) project with parabolic trough and molten salt storage technology (the “Kathu Project”)

located in the town of Kathu, Northern Cape; and

b. the contemporaneously notified transaction where Revego intends to acquire Aurora Wind Power (RF) (Pty) Ltd, a renewable energy Independent Power Producer (“IPP”).

[6] The Commission found it unlikely any information exchange concerns may arise through Investec as a platform for the exchange of competitively sensitive information due to the fact that:

a. Revego’s supply of electricity will be for Eskom’s national grid in line with the Renewable Energy Independent Power Producers Procurement Programme (“REIPPPP”) and the associated tender process.

b. The acquiring group’s strategy in acquiring stakes in several renewable energy projects; and, with the exception of Aurora, the acquiring group will only hold minority shareholding and will not be active in the day-to-day operation and management of any of the various renewal energy projects.

[7] Neither of the target firms have any employees and accordingly, the proposed transaction will not have an adverse effect on employment and the merger also raises no other public interest concerns.

[8] We concluded that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market, or to have a negative impact on the public interest.

Signed by:Enver Daniels

Signed at:2021-05-25 17:16:21 +02:00

Reason:Witnessing Enver Daniels

Mr Enver Daniels

Date: 25 May 2021

Ms Yasmin Carrim and Ms Andiswa Ndoni concurring

Tribunal Case Manager:

Mpumelelo Tshabalala

For the Merging Parties:

Anton Roets and Avias Ngwenya

For the Commission:

Reabetswe Molotsi and Grashum Mutizwa

[1] Genesis Khobab holds a 15% interest in South Africa Mainstream Renewable Power Khobab Wind (RF) Proprietary Limited (the Khobab

renewable project).

[2] Genesis Loeriesfontein holds a 15% interest in South Africa Mainstream Renewable Power Loeriesfontein 2 (RF) Proprietary Limited

(the Loeriesfontein renewable project).

[3] Genesis Noupoort holds a 15% interest in South Africa Mainstream Renewable Power Noupoort (RF) Proprietary Limited (the Noupoort

renewable project).

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act, 1998

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Competition Tribunal Rule 35(5)(a)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Renewable Energy Independent Power Producers Procurement Programme (REIPPPP)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.