RFS Holdings BV v ABN Amro Holdings NV (53/LM/Jul09) [2009] ZACT 60 (1 October 2009)
The Tribunal found that the transaction would not result in a substantial lessening or prevention of competition in South Africa, as there was no overlap in the activities of the acquiring group and the target firm within the country. Furthermore, the transaction did not raise any significant public interest concerns. Accordingly, the Tribunal unconditionally approved the acquisition.
- Citation
- [2009] ZACT 60
- Parties
- Applicant: RFS Holdings BV; Respondent: ABN Amro Holdings NV
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 1 October 2009
- Case Number
- 53/LM/Jul09
- Procedural Posture
- Merger Control / Tribunal Approval
- Outcome
- Merger unconditionally approved.
- Judges
- N Manoim, Y Carrim, A Wessels
- Legal Topics
- Merger Control, Substantial Lessening of Competition, Public Interest, International Banking Acquisition
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
RFS Holdings BV
Applicant
ABN Amro Holdings NV
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Merger Control / Tribunal Approval
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed acquisition would result in a substantial lessening or prevention of competition in South Africa.
- 2 Whether the transaction raises any significant public interest concerns.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the transaction would not result in a substantial lessening or prevention of competition in South Africa, as there was no overlap in the activities of the acquiring group and the target firm within the country. Furthermore, the transaction did not raise any significant public interest concerns. Accordingly, the Tribunal unconditionally approved the acquisition.
Court Disposition
Merger unconditionally approved.
Orders
- The acquisition by RFS Holdings BV of ABN Amro Holdings NV is unconditionally approved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment