Rham Equipment (Pty) Ltd v Lloyd and Others (J 720/08) [2008] ZALC 74; (2008) 29 ILJ 3033 (LC) (13 June 2008)
The court held that the execution of the arbitration award should be stayed pending the outcome of the applicant's review application. The underlying causa of the writ of execution is in dispute, as the applicant has launched a review of the award and the first respondent has not opposed the application. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] ZALC 74
- Parties
- Applicant: Rham Equipment (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Neville Lloyd; Respondent: Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration; Respondent: The Sheriff, Kempton Park
- Court
- Labour Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 13 June 2008
- Case Number
- J 720/08
- Procedural Posture
- Stay Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Review
- Outcome
- Application for stay of execution granted.
- Judges
- AC Basson
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Review of Arbitration Award, Irreparable Harm, Balance of Convenience
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rham Equipment (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Neville Lloyd
Respondent
Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration
Respondent
The Sheriff, Kempton Park
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the execution of the arbitration award should be stayed pending the outcome of the applicant's review application.
- 2 Whether the applicant will suffer irreparable harm if the sale in execution proceeds before the review is determined.
- 3 Whether the underlying causa of the writ of execution is in dispute.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the execution of the arbitration award should be stayed pending the outcome of the applicant's review application. The underlying causa of the writ of execution is in dispute, as the applicant has launched a review of the award and the first respondent has not opposed the application. The applicant demonstrated that it would suffer irreparable harm if the sale in execution proceeded, as the value of the attached engine exceeds the amount recoverable and the first respondent is unlikely to be able to repay the amount if the review succeeds. The court found that real and substantial injustice would result if the stay was not granted, and that the applicant would lose its...
Court Disposition
Application for stay of execution granted.
Orders
- The warrant of execution issued against the applicant is stayed pending the finalization of the review application.
- The attachment of the John Deere 6068PF 250 6 cylinder engine is uplifted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment