Richman v Ben-Tovim (674/05) [2006] ZASCA 121; 2007 (2) SA 283 (SCA); [2007] 2 All SA 234 (SCA) (29 November 2006)

Richman v Ben-Tovim (674/05) [2006] ZASCA 121; 2007 (2) SA 283 (SCA); [2007] 2 All SA 234 (SCA) (29 November 2006)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that personal service within the jurisdiction is a sufficient ground for international competence in money proceedings, especially considering the realities of international business and the need for South African courts to recognize and enforce foreign judgments where appropriate. The court found that the Protection of Business Act 99 of 1978 does not apply to claims for professional services, as its scope is limited to transactions involving raw materials or substances. The respondent's public policy defence was rejected because the appellant was permitted to charge fees in England, where the services were rendered, and there was no evidence that such...

Citation
[2006] ZASCA 121
Parties
Appellant: Richman; Respondent: Ben-Tovim
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
29 November 2006
Case Number
674/05
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Court a Quo
Outcome
Appeal allowed; provisional sentence granted in favour of the appellant.
Judges
R H Zulman, Cameron JA, Brand JA, Maya JA, Theron AJA
Legal Topics
International Jurisdiction, Recognition of Foreign Judgments, Provisional Sentence, Public Policy Defence, Protection of Business Act
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate International Jurisdiction Recognition of Foreign Judgments Provisional Sentence Public Policy Defence Protection of Business Act

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Richman

Appellant

Ben-Tovim

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Court a Quo

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether personal service within the court's area is a sufficient ground for international jurisdiction in money proceedings under modern Roman Dutch law.
  2. 2 Whether the Protection of Business Act 99 of 1978 bars enforcement of the foreign judgment in this case.
  3. 3 Whether public policy considerations preclude recognition or enforcement of the claim for fees and disbursements.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that personal service within the jurisdiction is a sufficient ground for international competence in money proceedings, especially considering the realities of international business and the need for South African courts to recognize and enforce foreign judgments where appropriate. The court found that the Protection of Business Act 99 of 1978 does not apply to claims for professional services, as its scope is limited to transactions involving raw materials or substances. The respondent's public policy defence was rejected because the appellant was permitted to charge fees in England, where the services were rendered, and there was no evidence that such...

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; provisional sentence granted in favour of the appellant.

Orders

  • The order of the court a quo is set aside and replaced with an order granting provisional sentence in favour of the plaintiff against the defendant for payment of 57,882.179 English Pounds, alternatively the Rand equivalent thereof determined in accordance with the exchange rate prevailing as at the date of payment.
  • Interest on the aforesaid sum at the rate of 8 per cent per annum from 17 December 2003 to date of payment.