Riemhogte CC and Others v Jacob Durr Trust and Others (1335/2020) [2020] ZAMPMHC 33 (24 July 2020)
The court found that the respondents failed to prove any valid lien over the cattle and progeny, as they did not provide evidence of actual expenses or enrichment. The respondents' opposition consisted of bald and unsubstantiated allegations, and no material factual disputes existed to preclude relief on motion. The applicants were entitled to vindicate and recover all cattle delivered, as well as calves born after litis contestatio (5 May 2020), with those born before remaining with the respondents. The cash deposit paid by the applicants was not disputed and had to be repaid, as the respondents' alleged counterclaims were unliquidated and could not be set off. The respondents' conduct...
- Citation
- [2020] ZAMPMHC 33
- Parties
- Applicant: Riemhoogte CC; Applicant: Leon Renier van Tonder; Applicant: Leon Renier van Tonder N.O.; Applicant: Corné van Tonder N.O.; Applicant: Wouter van der Merwe N.O.; Respondent: The Jacob Durr Trust (IT 5808/1997); Respondent: Jacob Durr; Respondent: Calicom Trading 388 CC
- Court
- Middelburg High Court, Mpumalanga
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 24 July 2020
- Case Number
- 1335/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Final Determination After Prior Urgent Application Struck Off for Lack of Urgency
- Outcome
- Application granted. The respondents are ordered to return the cattle and progeny (subject to litis contestatio), repay the cash deposit, and pay punitive costs.
- Judges
- Brauckmann
- Legal Topics
- Rei Vindicatio, Alienation of Land Act, Lien, Ownership of Progeny, Motion Proceedings, Set Off
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Riemhoogte CC
Applicant
Leon Renier van Tonder
Applicant
Leon Renier van Tonder N.O.
Applicant
Corné van Tonder N.O.
Applicant
Wouter van der Merwe N.O.
Applicant
The Jacob Durr Trust (IT 5808/1997)
Respondent
Jacob Durr
Respondent
Calicom Trading 388 CC
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Final Determination After Prior Urgent Application Struck Off for Lack of Urgency
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondents have a valid lien over the cattle and progeny delivered by the applicants.
- 2 Whether the applicants are entitled to vindicate and recover the cattle and progeny from the respondents.
- 3 Whether the applicants are entitled to repayment of the cash deposit paid to the respondents.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondents failed to prove any valid lien over the cattle and progeny, as they did not provide evidence of actual expenses or enrichment. The respondents' opposition consisted of bald and unsubstantiated allegations, and no material factual disputes existed to preclude relief on motion. The applicants were entitled to vindicate and recover all cattle delivered, as well as calves born after litis contestatio (5 May 2020), with those born before remaining with the respondents. The cash deposit paid by the applicants was not disputed and had to be repaid, as the respondents' alleged counterclaims were unliquidated and could not be set off. The respondents' conduct...
Court Disposition
Application granted. The respondents are ordered to return the cattle and progeny (subject to litis contestatio), repay the cash deposit, and pay punitive costs.
Orders
- The respondents must forthwith return all of the first applicant's cattle bearing specified brand marks and any offspring born before 5 May 2020 to the first applicant.
- The respondents must disclose in writing the location and number of all cattle and offspring.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment