Riffel and Another v Riffel and Others (LCC78/2018) [2018] ZALCC 35 (31 October 2018)
The Applicants have satisfied all statutory requirements for eviction under ESTA. The Respondents, as long-term occupiers over 60, committed a material breach by orchestrating and participating in violent conduct against the Applicants and others, resulting in an irretrievable breakdown of the relationship. The Respondents' denials are bare and unsupported by credible evidence, and no genuine disputes of fact have been raised. Notices of termination were properly served, and the Respondents have already secured alternative accommodation. The hardship to the Applicants, who needed to sell the property for health and financial reasons, outweighs the inconvenience to the Respondents. The...
- Citation
- [2018] ZALCC 35
- Parties
- Applicant: Charles Johannes Riffel; Applicant: Gertruida Riffel; Respondent: Derrick Riffel; Respondent: Mary Pietersen; Respondent: Levona Ross; Respondent: Stellenbosch Municipality; Respondent: Head: Western Cape Provincial Department of Rural Development and Land Affairs
- Court
- Land Claims Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 31 October 2018
- Case Number
- LCC78/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Final Eviction Application / Judgment on Application for Final Eviction Following Interim Eviction Order
- Outcome
- Final eviction order granted against the First, Second, and Third Respondents.
- Judges
- Meer
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Security of Tenure Act, Eviction of Long Term Occupiers, Irretrievable Breakdown of Relationship, Compliance With Statutory Eviction Requirements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charles Johannes Riffel
Applicant
Gertruida Riffel
Applicant
Derrick Riffel
Respondent
Mary Pietersen
Respondent
Levona Ross
Respondent
Stellenbosch Municipality
Respondent
Head: Western Cape Provincial Department of Rural Development and Land Affairs
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Final Eviction Application / Judgment on Application for Final Eviction Following Interim Eviction Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Applicants have complied with the mandatory requirements for eviction under Section 9(2) of ESTA.
- 2 Whether the Respondents, as long-term occupiers over 60, have committed a material breach justifying termination under Section 8(4) and Section 10(1)(c) of ESTA.
- 3 Whether the relationship between the parties has irretrievably broken down, making continued occupation untenable.
Ratio Decidendi
The Applicants have satisfied all statutory requirements for eviction under ESTA. The Respondents, as long-term occupiers over 60, committed a material breach by orchestrating and participating in violent conduct against the Applicants and others, resulting in an irretrievable breakdown of the relationship. The Respondents' denials are bare and unsupported by credible evidence, and no genuine disputes of fact have been raised. Notices of termination were properly served, and the Respondents have already secured alternative accommodation. The hardship to the Applicants, who needed to sell the property for health and financial reasons, outweighs the inconvenience to the Respondents. The...
Court Disposition
Final eviction order granted against the First, Second, and Third Respondents.
Orders
- The First, Second and Third Respondents shall vacate the property known as Remainder of Farm 1052 Franschhoek, Western Cape by no later than 26 November 2018.
- If the First to Third Respondents fail to vacate by 26 November 2018, the Sheriff is authorised to evict them on 27 November 2018.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment