Download PDF

South Africa Judgment

Competition Tribunal

RMB Investments and Advisory (Pty) Ltd and Another v Trustees for the time being of Truzen 89 Trust in respect of the property letting enterprise known as Mall of the South (LM145Oct20) [2020] ZACT 50 (10 December 2020)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in the market for rentable retail space in regional and comparative centres at Aspen Lakes Extension 12, Gauteng. The merged entity's market share post-merger would be 13.90%, with an accretion of 4.60%, and sufficient competition would remain from other retail property owners. Furthermore, the transaction would not result in any retrenchments or job losses, as all employees would be transferred in accordance with Section 197 of the Labour Relations Act. No other public interest concerns were raised. Accordingly, the Tribunal approved the transaction unconditionally.

Court disposition

The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.

Orders

  • The merger between RMB Investments and Advisory (Pty) Ltd, Redefine Properties Limited, and the Trustees for the time being of Truzen 89 Trust in respect of Mall of the South is approved without conditions.

02

Material facts

Parties

RMB Investments and Advisory (Pty) Ltd

Applicant Counsel: Vani Chetty

Redefine Properties Limited

Applicant Counsel: Vani Chetty

Trustees for the time being of Truzen 89 Trust

Respondent

Amounts and remedies

  • Post Merger Market Share: 13.9
  • Market Share Accretion: 4.6
  • Gross Lettable Area (gla) of Mall of the South (sqm): 72,070

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Merger Approval / Final Determination

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The merging parties argued that the transaction would not result in any substantial lessening of competition, as the merged entity would continue to face competition from several other retail property owners in the area. They further confirmed that no retrenchments or job losses would occur, and all employees would be transferred in accordance with Section 197 of the Labour Relations Act.
Respondent
The Competition Commission submitted that the transaction results in a horizontal overlap in the market for rentable retail space in regional and comparative centres at Aspen Lakes Extension 12, Gauteng, due to Redefine's ownership of three comparative retail centres within a 25km radius. However, the Commission concluded that the merged entity's market share post-merger would be 13.90%, with an accretion of 4.60%, and that sufficient competition would remain in the market. No public interest concerns were identified.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act 89 of 1998

    A merger may only be prohibited if it is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in the relevant market.

  2. 02

    Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995

    Employees affected by a transfer of a business as a going concern must be transferred in terms of Section 197 of the Labour Relations Act.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in the market for rentable retail space in regional and comparative centres at Aspen Lakes Extension 12, Gauteng. The merged entity's market share post-merger would be 13.90%, with an accretion of 4.60%, and sufficient competition would remain from other retail property owners. Furthermore, the transaction would not result in any retrenchments or job losses, as all employees would be transferred in accordance with Section 197 of the Labour Relations Act. No other public interest concerns were raised. Accordingly, the Tribunal approved the transaction unconditionally.

Obiter and limits

  • The Tribunal noted that the parties initially anticipated exercising a PUT Option Arrangement but later confirmed that only approval for the Enterprise Transaction was sought.
  • The Commission's analysis relied on market share calculations and the presence of competing retail properties within a 25km radius, supporting the conclusion that competition would not be substantially lessened.

Court disposition

The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.

  • The merger between RMB Investments and Advisory (Pty) Ltd, Redefine Properties Limited, and the Trustees for the time being of Truzen 89 Trust in respect of Mall of the South is approved without conditions.

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Judgment

[2020] ZACT 50

COMPETITION

TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

Case No: LM145Oct20

In the matter between:

RMB Investments and Advisory (Pty) Ltd and

Redefine Properties Limited Primary Acquiring Firm(s)

and

The Trustees for the time being of Truzen 89 Trust Primary Target Firm

in respect of the property letting enterprise known

as Mall of the South

Panel : Yasmin Carrim (Presiding Member)

: Fiona Tregenna (Tribunal Member)

: Thando Vilakazi (Tribunal Member)

Heard on : 25 November 2020

Order Issued on : 25 November 2020

Reasons Issued on : 10 December 2020

Reasons for Decision

Approval

[1] On 25 November 2020, the Competition Tribunal ("Tribunal") approved the proposed transaction between RMB Investments and Advisory (Pty) Ltd and Redefine Properties Limited and the Trustees for the time being of Truzen 89 Trust in respect of the property letting enterprise known as Mall of the South.

[2] The reasons for approving the proposed transaction follow.

Parties to proposed transaction

Primary acquiring finns

[3] The first primary acquiring firm is RMB Investments and Advisory Proprietary Limited ("RMBIA"). RMBIA is an investment company incorporated in accordance with the company laws of the Republic of South Africa. RMBIA is a wholly owned subsidiary of FirstRand Investment Holdings Limited ("FirstRand Investment Holdings"). FirstRand Investment Holdings is controlled by FirstRand Limited ("FirstRand"}, a public company listed on Johannesburg Securities Exchange ("JSE") and the Namibian Stock Exchange. FirstRand is not controlled by any firm or shareholder.

[4] RMBIA is an investment company and its main business is the acquisition and holding of assets for investment purposes. [...]

[5] The second primary firm is Redefine Properties Limited ("Redefine"}, a Real Estate Investment Trust ("REIT") which is listed on the JSE and is not controlled by any firm or shareholder. Redefine controls numerous firms such as Alice Lane Trust, Annuity Asset Managers (Pty) Ltd, and Annuity Properties Limited.

[6] Redefine's property portfolio comprises a diverse range of properties comprising office, retail, residential and industrial space situated throughout South Africa.

Primary target firm

[7] The primary target firm is the Trustees for the time being of Truzen 89 Trust ("Truzen Trust") in respect of the property letting enterprise known as Mall of the South ("Target Property"). The Target Property is a regional centre comprising of 72 070m2 of gross lettable area ("GLA") and is situated on the corner of Swartkoppies Road and Kliprivier Drive, Aspen Lakes Extension 12, in the Gauteng Province.

[8] [...]

Proposed transaction and rationale

[9] In terms of the proposed transaction, RMBIA, Redefine, and the Truzen Trust have entered into a Sale of Enterprise Agreement ("Sale Agreement") and agreed to incorporate a new company ("Propco SPV") with the intention that Propco SPV will acquire the property letting enterprise known as Mall of the South together with the fixed assets and the property upon which it is located ("Enterprise") from Truzen Trust. This transaction shall be referred to as the "Enterprise Transaction".

[10] The parties had initially anticipated that they would have to exercise a PUT Option Arrangement but later confirmed that they only wanted approval for the Enterprise Transaction.'

[11] Upon implementation of the proposed transaction, the shares in Propco SPV will be held by RMBIA (80%) and Redefine (20%). Both RMBIA and Redefine will exercise joint control over Propco SPV and the Mall of the South.

[12] […]

[13] […]

[14] […]

Impact on competition

[15] The Commission considered the activities of the merging parties and found that the proposed transaction results in a horizontal overlap in the market for rentable retail space in regional and comparative centres at Aspen Lakes Extension 12, Gauteng. The overlap arises due to Redefine's ownership of three comparative retail centres within a 25km radius of the Target Property at Aspen Lakes Extension 12.[2]

[16] In terms of the market shares, the Commission submitted that post-merger, the merged entity will have an estimated market share of 13.90% with an accretion of 4.60%.[3] Further, the Commission submitted that the merged entity will continue to face competition from numerous competing retail properties which are owned by Momentum Metropolitan, JH Group, Hyprop Investments Limited & Ellerine Bros, One Property Holdings and Vukile Property Fund Limited.

[17] In light of the above, the Commission is of the view that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition within the relevant market.

Public interest

[18] The merging parties confirmed that there will be no retrenchments or job losses arising from the transaction. All employees employed by Truzen Trust in respect of the Mall of the South, will be transferred to Propco SPV in terms of Section 197 of the Labour Relations Act.

[19] The proposed transaction raises no other public interest concerns.

Conclusion

[20] In light of the above, we concluded that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. In addition, no public interest issues arise from the proposed transaction. Accordingly, we approved the proposed transaction unconditionally.

Signed by:Yasmin Tayob Carrlm

Signed at:2020-12-10 11:41:30 +02:00

Reason:I approve this document 10 December 2020

Ms. Yasmin Carrim DATE

Prof Fiona Tregenna and Dr Thando Vilakazi concurring

Tribunal Researcher: Busisiwe Masina

For the merging parties: Vani Chetty of Vani Chetty Competition Law (Pty) Ltd.

For the Commission: Nonhlanhla Msiza

[1] [...]

[2] Please see Table 1 page 81-83 of the Competitive Report

[3] Please see Table 3 page 14 of the CC recommendation

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act 89 of 1998

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.