RMB Investments and Advisory (Pty) Ltd and Another v Trustees for the time being of Truzen 89 Trust in respect of the property letting enterprise known as Mall of the South (LM145Oct20) [2020] ZACT 50 (10 December 2020)
- Citation
- [2020] ZACT 50
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- Yasmin Carrim, Fiona Tregenna, Thando Vilakazi
- Case number
- LM145Oct20
More details
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- Yasmin Carrim, Fiona Tregenna, Thando Vilakazi
- Case number
- LM145Oct20
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in the market for rentable retail space in regional and comparative centres at Aspen Lakes Extension 12, Gauteng. The merged entity's market share post-merger would be 13.90%, with an accretion of 4.60%, and sufficient competition would remain from other retail property owners. Furthermore, the transaction would not result in any retrenchments or job losses, as all employees would be transferred in accordance with Section 197 of the Labour Relations Act. No other public interest concerns were raised. Accordingly, the Tribunal approved the transaction unconditionally.
Court disposition
The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.
Orders
- The merger between RMB Investments and Advisory (Pty) Ltd, Redefine Properties Limited, and the Trustees for the time being of Truzen 89 Trust in respect of Mall of the South is approved without conditions.
02
Material facts
Parties
RMB Investments and Advisory (Pty) Ltd
Applicant Counsel: Vani ChettyRedefine Properties Limited
Applicant Counsel: Vani ChettyTrustees for the time being of Truzen 89 Trust
RespondentAmounts and remedies
- Post Merger Market Share: 13.9
- Market Share Accretion: 4.6
- Gross Lettable Area (gla) of Mall of the South (sqm): 72,070
03
Procedural history
Posture
Merger Approval / Final Determination
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the proposed transaction will substantially prevent or lessen competition in the relevant market.
- 02
Whether the transaction raises any public interest concerns, including employment impacts.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The merging parties argued that the transaction would not result in any substantial lessening of competition, as the merged entity would continue to face competition from several other retail property owners in the area. They further confirmed that no retrenchments or job losses would occur, and all employees would be transferred in accordance with Section 197 of the Labour Relations Act.
- Respondent
- The Competition Commission submitted that the transaction results in a horizontal overlap in the market for rentable retail space in regional and comparative centres at Aspen Lakes Extension 12, Gauteng, due to Redefine's ownership of three comparative retail centres within a 25km radius. However, the Commission concluded that the merged entity's market share post-merger would be 13.90%, with an accretion of 4.60%, and that sufficient competition would remain in the market. No public interest concerns were identified.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Competition Act 89 of 1998
A merger may only be prohibited if it is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in the relevant market.
- 02
Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995
Employees affected by a transfer of a business as a going concern must be transferred in terms of Section 197 of the Labour Relations Act.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in the market for rentable retail space in regional and comparative centres at Aspen Lakes Extension 12, Gauteng. The merged entity's market share post-merger would be 13.90%, with an accretion of 4.60%, and sufficient competition would remain from other retail property owners. Furthermore, the transaction would not result in any retrenchments or job losses, as all employees would be transferred in accordance with Section 197 of the Labour Relations Act. No other public interest concerns were raised. Accordingly, the Tribunal approved the transaction unconditionally.
Obiter and limits
- The Tribunal noted that the parties initially anticipated exercising a PUT Option Arrangement but later confirmed that only approval for the Enterprise Transaction was sought.
- The Commission's analysis relied on market share calculations and the presence of competing retail properties within a 25km radius, supporting the conclusion that competition would not be substantially lessened.
Court disposition
The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.
- The merger between RMB Investments and Advisory (Pty) Ltd, Redefine Properties Limited, and the Trustees for the time being of Truzen 89 Trust in respect of Mall of the South is approved without conditions.
Source and reliance status
Competition Tribunal
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Competition Tribunal
Judgment
COMPETITION
TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case No: LM145Oct20
In the matter between:
RMB Investments and Advisory (Pty) Ltd and
Redefine Properties Limited Primary Acquiring Firm(s)
and
The Trustees for the time being of Truzen 89 Trust Primary Target Firm
in respect of the property letting enterprise known
as Mall of the South
Panel : Yasmin Carrim (Presiding Member)
: Fiona Tregenna (Tribunal Member)
: Thando Vilakazi (Tribunal Member)
Heard on : 25 November 2020
Order Issued on : 25 November 2020
Reasons Issued on : 10 December 2020
Reasons for Decision
Approval
[1] On 25 November 2020, the Competition Tribunal ("Tribunal") approved the proposed transaction between RMB Investments and Advisory (Pty) Ltd and Redefine Properties Limited and the Trustees for the time being of Truzen 89 Trust in respect of the property letting enterprise known as Mall of the South.
[2] The reasons for approving the proposed transaction follow.
Parties to proposed transaction
Primary acquiring finns
[3] The first primary acquiring firm is RMB Investments and Advisory Proprietary Limited ("RMBIA"). RMBIA is an investment company incorporated in accordance with the company laws of the Republic of South Africa. RMBIA is a wholly owned subsidiary of FirstRand Investment Holdings Limited ("FirstRand Investment Holdings"). FirstRand Investment Holdings is controlled by FirstRand Limited ("FirstRand"}, a public company listed on Johannesburg Securities Exchange ("JSE") and the Namibian Stock Exchange. FirstRand is not controlled by any firm or shareholder.
[4] RMBIA is an investment company and its main business is the acquisition and holding of assets for investment purposes. [...]
[5] The second primary firm is Redefine Properties Limited ("Redefine"}, a Real Estate Investment Trust ("REIT") which is listed on the JSE and is not controlled by any firm or shareholder. Redefine controls numerous firms such as Alice Lane Trust, Annuity Asset Managers (Pty) Ltd, and Annuity Properties Limited.
[6] Redefine's property portfolio comprises a diverse range of properties comprising office, retail, residential and industrial space situated throughout South Africa.
Primary target firm
[7] The primary target firm is the Trustees for the time being of Truzen 89 Trust ("Truzen Trust") in respect of the property letting enterprise known as Mall of the South ("Target Property"). The Target Property is a regional centre comprising of 72 070m2 of gross lettable area ("GLA") and is situated on the corner of Swartkoppies Road and Kliprivier Drive, Aspen Lakes Extension 12, in the Gauteng Province.
[8] [...]
Proposed transaction and rationale
[9] In terms of the proposed transaction, RMBIA, Redefine, and the Truzen Trust have entered into a Sale of Enterprise Agreement ("Sale Agreement") and agreed to incorporate a new company ("Propco SPV") with the intention that Propco SPV will acquire the property letting enterprise known as Mall of the South together with the fixed assets and the property upon which it is located ("Enterprise") from Truzen Trust. This transaction shall be referred to as the "Enterprise Transaction".
[10] The parties had initially anticipated that they would have to exercise a PUT Option Arrangement but later confirmed that they only wanted approval for the Enterprise Transaction.'
[11] Upon implementation of the proposed transaction, the shares in Propco SPV will be held by RMBIA (80%) and Redefine (20%). Both RMBIA and Redefine will exercise joint control over Propco SPV and the Mall of the South.
[12] [â¦]
[13] [â¦]
[14] [â¦]
Impact on competition
[15] The Commission considered the activities of the merging parties and found that the proposed transaction results in a horizontal overlap in the market for rentable retail space in regional and comparative centres at Aspen Lakes Extension 12, Gauteng. The overlap arises due to Redefine's ownership of three comparative retail centres within a 25km radius of the Target Property at Aspen Lakes Extension 12.[2]
[16] In terms of the market shares, the Commission submitted that post-merger, the merged entity will have an estimated market share of 13.90% with an accretion of 4.60%.[3] Further, the Commission submitted that the merged entity will continue to face competition from numerous competing retail properties which are owned by Momentum Metropolitan, JH Group, Hyprop Investments Limited & Ellerine Bros, One Property Holdings and Vukile Property Fund Limited.
[17] In light of the above, the Commission is of the view that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition within the relevant market.
Public interest
[18] The merging parties confirmed that there will be no retrenchments or job losses arising from the transaction. All employees employed by Truzen Trust in respect of the Mall of the South, will be transferred to Propco SPV in terms of Section 197 of the Labour Relations Act.
[19] The proposed transaction raises no other public interest concerns.
Conclusion
[20] In light of the above, we concluded that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. In addition, no public interest issues arise from the proposed transaction. Accordingly, we approved the proposed transaction unconditionally.
Signed by:Yasmin Tayob Carrlm
Signed at:2020-12-10 11:41:30 +02:00
Reason:I approve this document 10 December 2020
Ms. Yasmin Carrim DATE
Prof Fiona Tregenna and Dr Thando Vilakazi concurring
Tribunal Researcher: Busisiwe Masina
For the merging parties: Vani Chetty of Vani Chetty Competition Law (Pty) Ltd.
For the Commission: Nonhlanhla Msiza
[1] [...]
[2] Please see Table 1 page 81-83 of the Competitive Report
[3] Please see Table 3 page 14 of the CC recommendation
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.