R.N.M v T.T and Another (64816/2013) [2016] ZAGPPHC 704 (16 August 2016)

R.N.M v T.T and Another (64816/2013) [2016] ZAGPPHC 704 (16 August 2016)

The plaintiff's evidence, corroborated by video footage, established that she was assaulted and humiliated by the defendants over a prolonged period, including being chased naked in public, assaulted with a sjambok, and further humiliated by the publication of photos in the media. The first defendant was the main perpetrator, inflicting the most severe physical and emotional harm. The second defendant participated but to a lesser extent. The court found the plaintiff to be a credible witness and accepted her account. The defendants chose not to defend the matter. Considering comparable awards, the court determined that R150,000 against the first defendant and R15,000 against the second...

Citation
[2016] ZAGPPHC 704
Parties
Plaintiff: R N M; Defendant: T T; Defendant: L F M
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
16 August 2016
Case Number
64816/2013
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Unopposed Trial; Damages Claim for Assault
Outcome
Plaintiff's claim for damages succeeded; judgment granted against both defendants in specified amounts with interest and costs.
Judges
C Pretorius
Legal Topics
Assault, Damages Quantum, Humiliation, General Damages, Interest on Award
Delict Assault Damages Quantum Humiliation General Damages Interest on Award

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

R N M

Plaintiff

T T

Defendant

L F M

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trial / Unopposed Trial; Damages Claim for Assault

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendants assaulted and humiliated the plaintiff on 7 October 2012.
  2. 2 What is the appropriate quantum of damages for the plaintiff's pain, humiliation, and indignity.
  3. 3 Whether interest and costs should be awarded.

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff's evidence, corroborated by video footage, established that she was assaulted and humiliated by the defendants over a prolonged period, including being chased naked in public, assaulted with a sjambok, and further humiliated by the publication of photos in the media. The first defendant was the main perpetrator, inflicting the most severe physical and emotional harm. The second defendant participated but to a lesser extent. The court found the plaintiff to be a credible witness and accepted her account. The defendants chose not to defend the matter. Considering comparable awards, the court determined that R150,000 against the first defendant and R15,000 against the second...

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's claim for damages succeeded; judgment granted against both defendants in specified amounts with interest and costs.

Orders

  • The first defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff damages in the amount of R150,000.
  • The first defendant is ordered to pay interest on the amount of R150,000 at the rate of 9% a tempore morae.