Road Accident Fund v Coughlan (702/13) [2014] ZASCA 106; 2014 (6) SA 376 (SCA) (3 September 2014)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that foster child grants paid to the foster parent following the death of the children's mother are deductible from damages awarded for loss of support under the Road Accident Fund Act. The court found no substantive distinction between foster child grants and other social assistance grants, as both are paid to enable the support of children who have lost a breadwinner. The grants were received as a direct consequence of the mother's death, and awarding both damages and grants would result in double compensation, which is impermissible. The court rejected the argument that the grants were purely acts of State gratuity, emphasizing that the grants served...
- Citation
- [2014] ZASCA 106
- Parties
- Appellant: Road Accident Fund; Respondent: Wayne Coughlan NO
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 3 September 2014
- Case Number
- 702/13
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld. The order of the high court is set aside and replaced with an order that foster child grants are to be taken into account in assessing damages for loss of support, and since these exceed the agreed damages, no payment is ordered.
- Judges
- Lewis, Theron, Pillay, Mbha, Mathopo
- Legal Topics
- Loss of Support, Double Compensation, Social Assistance Grants, Foster Child Grants
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Road Accident Fund
Appellant
Wayne Coughlan NO
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Legal Issues
- 1 Are foster child grants paid to the dependants of a deceased covered by the Road Accident Fund Act deductible from damages awarded for loss of support?
- 2 Does the receipt of foster child grants constitute double compensation when damages for loss of support are also awarded?
- 3 Is there a substantive distinction between foster child grants and other social assistance grants for purposes of deduction from damages?
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that foster child grants paid to the foster parent following the death of the children's mother are deductible from damages awarded for loss of support under the Road Accident Fund Act. The court found no substantive distinction between foster child grants and other social assistance grants, as both are paid to enable the support of children who have lost a breadwinner. The grants were received as a direct consequence of the mother's death, and awarding both damages and grants would result in double compensation, which is impermissible. The court rejected the argument that the grants were purely acts of State gratuity, emphasizing that the grants served...
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld. The order of the high court is set aside and replaced with an order that foster child grants are to be taken into account in assessing damages for loss of support, and since these exceed the agreed damages, no payment is ordered.
Orders
- The appeal is upheld.
- The order of the high court is set aside and replaced with: 'The foster child grants are to be taken into account in assessing the damages to be awarded for loss of support, and, since these exceed the amount agreed to be payable as damages by the defendant, no order as to payment is made.'
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment