Road Accident Fund v Coughlan In his capacity as Curator Ad Litem to Blackbeard (5857/2006) [2011] ZAWCHC 10 (2 March 2011)
The appeal succeeded in part. The court found that the trial court had materially misdirected itself by attributing a remuneration of R1,250,000 per annum to the position of Junior Executive Director, when the correct figure, based on expert evidence, should have been R975,000 per annum, excluding profit share. The trial court's exclusion of profit share from the calculation was upheld. The court confirmed the trial court's approach to contingency deductions as conservative and appropriate, and agreed that any social security grants received by the patient should be deducted in the actuarial calculation. The order of the trial court was varied only to the extent of correcting the...
- Citation
- [2011] ZAWCHC 10
- Parties
- Appellant: Road Accident Fund; Respondent: Advocate Wayne Saleem Coughlan in his capacity as Curator Ad Litem to Marc Athol Gordon Blackbeard
- Court
- Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 2 March 2011
- Case Number
- 5857/2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Trial Court Judgment on Quantum of Damages
- Outcome
- Appeal partially upheld; order of trial court varied to correct remuneration figure and require deduction of social security grants; all other aspects of the order to stand.
- Judges
- Gamble, Moosa, Baartman
- Legal Topics
- Road Accident Fund, Loss of Earnings, Quantum of Damages, Contingency Deductions, Curatorship, Actuarial Calculation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Road Accident Fund
Appellant
Advocate Wayne Saleem Coughlan in his capacity as Curator Ad Litem to Marc Athol Gordon Blackbeard
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Trial Court Judgment on Quantum of Damages
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial court erred in its assessment of the patient's future loss of earnings.
- 2 Whether the remuneration attributed to the position of Junior Executive Director was correct.
- 3 Whether profit share should be included in the calculation of loss of earnings.
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal succeeded in part. The court found that the trial court had materially misdirected itself by attributing a remuneration of R1,250,000 per annum to the position of Junior Executive Director, when the correct figure, based on expert evidence, should have been R975,000 per annum, excluding profit share. The trial court's exclusion of profit share from the calculation was upheld. The court confirmed the trial court's approach to contingency deductions as conservative and appropriate, and agreed that any social security grants received by the patient should be deducted in the actuarial calculation. The order of the trial court was varied only to the extent of correcting the...
Court Disposition
Appeal partially upheld; order of trial court varied to correct remuneration figure and require deduction of social security grants; all other aspects of the order to stand.
Orders
- The Appellant's application for condonation for late filing of the appeal record is granted.
- The appeal succeeds only to the extent that the directions to the actuaries regarding the remuneration figure are varied: R1,250,000 is replaced with R975,000 per annum for Junior Executive Director.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment