Roan Coal (Pty) Limited v Nonyane NO and Others (55323/17) [2018] ZAGPPHC 275 (31 January 2018)

Roan Coal (Pty) Limited v Nonyane NO and Others (55323/17) [2018] ZAGPPHC 275 (31 January 2018)

The application was dismissed with costs following argument in the urgent motion court. The judge delivered an extempore judgment at the time, and those reasons are on record. There is no need to supplement or repeat those reasons in writing, as they are available for transcription. The request for further reasons does not warrant additional commentary.

Citation
[2018] ZAGPPHC 275
Parties
Applicant: Roan Coal (Pty) Limited; Respondent: TH Nonyane NO and Others
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
31 January 2018
Case Number
55323/17
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Reasons for Order Following Urgent Motion Court
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs.
Judges
Tuchten
Legal Topics
Urgent Motion, Costs Order

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Roan Coal (Pty) Limited

Applicant

TH Nonyane NO and Others

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Urgent Application / Reasons for Order Following Urgent Motion Court

  1. 1 Whether the urgent application should be dismissed with costs.
  2. 2 Whether further reasons for the order are required beyond the extempore judgment.

Ratio Decidendi

The application was dismissed with costs following argument in the urgent motion court. The judge delivered an extempore judgment at the time, and those reasons are on record. There is no need to supplement or repeat those reasons in writing, as they are available for transcription. The request for further reasons does not warrant additional commentary.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The application is dismissed with costs.