Robispec (Pty) Ltd and Others North West Province Provincial Liquor Board and Others (M363/2016) [2017] ZANWHC 13 (26 January 2017)
The court found that the first respondent had unreasonably delayed consideration of the first applicant's liquor licence transfer application, and that the delay was unexplained and only remedied after the court application was served. Accordingly, the first respondent was ordered to pay the first applicant's costs. In respect of the second and third applicants, the court held that there was insufficient evidence that their applications were properly lodged with the magistrate or received by the relevant respondents. The applicants failed to follow up or verify receipt, and the presumption of proper performance of official acts did not apply. Therefore, the applications of the second and...
- Citation
- [2017] ZANWHC 13
- Parties
- Applicant: Robispec (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: Evangelos Vrysoulis and Eydoxia Vrysoulis; Applicant: Luhane Trading (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: North West Province Provincial Liquor Board; Respondent: Provincial Commissioner of Police for the North West Province; Respondent: Magistrate for Brits; Respondent: Magistrate for Vryburg
- Court
- North West High Court, Mafikeng
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 26 January 2017
- Case Number
- M363/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Reasons for Judgment Following Order Granted on 8 December 2016
- Outcome
- First respondent ordered to pay costs of first applicant's application; second and third applicants' applications dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- T J Djaje
- Legal Topics
- Liquor Licensing, Transfer of Licence, Administrative Delay, Costs Award, Burden of Proof
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robispec (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Evangelos Vrysoulis and Eydoxia Vrysoulis
Applicant
Luhane Trading (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
North West Province Provincial Liquor Board
Respondent
Provincial Commissioner of Police for the North West Province
Respondent
Magistrate for Brits
Respondent
Magistrate for Vryburg
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Reasons for Judgment Following Order Granted on 8 December 2016
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the first respondent unreasonably delayed consideration of the first applicant's liquor licence transfer application.
- 2 Whether the first respondent should be liable for costs in respect of the first applicant's application.
- 3 Whether the second and third applicants proved that their transfer applications were properly lodged and received by the relevant magistrate and respondents.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the first respondent had unreasonably delayed consideration of the first applicant's liquor licence transfer application, and that the delay was unexplained and only remedied after the court application was served. Accordingly, the first respondent was ordered to pay the first applicant's costs. In respect of the second and third applicants, the court held that there was insufficient evidence that their applications were properly lodged with the magistrate or received by the relevant respondents. The applicants failed to follow up or verify receipt, and the presumption of proper performance of official acts did not apply. Therefore, the applications of the second and...
Court Disposition
First respondent ordered to pay costs of first applicant's application; second and third applicants' applications dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The first respondent shall pay the costs of the first applicant's application.
- The applications of the second and third applicants are dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment