Rock Foundation Properties and Another v Chaitowitz (1038/2023) [2025] ZASCA 82 (9 June 2025)

Rock Foundation Properties and Another v Chaitowitz (1038/2023) [2025] ZASCA 82 (9 June 2025)

The court found that the applicants failed to establish exceptional circumstances justifying reconsideration of the refusal of leave to appeal. The applicants' case rested on the assertion that the agreements were simulated transactions amounting to an unlawful credit agreement, but this was a factual dispute already determined by the High Court and previously rejected on petition. No substantive issue of law or grave injustice was demonstrated. The applicants' reliance on the 'Brusson-type' fraud argument was abandoned, and the remaining contentions were a mere repetition of arguments previously dismissed. The court held that section 17(2)(f) is reserved for truly exceptional cases,...

Citation
[2025] ZASCA 82
Parties
Applicant: The Rock Foundation Properties; Applicant: Esther Nyarwi Ndegwa; Respondent: Dosvelt Properties (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Eli Nathan Chaitowitz
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
9 June 2025
Case Number
1038/2023
Procedural Posture
Reconsideration Application / Application for Reconsideration of Refusal of Petition for Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Application for reconsideration dismissed; matter struck from the roll; costs awarded against the applicants.
Judges
Mocumie, Keightley, Unterhalter
Legal Topics
Simulated Transaction, Credit Agreement, National Credit Act, Leave to Appeal, Exceptional Circumstances
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Simulated Transaction Credit Agreement National Credit Act Leave to Appeal Exceptional Circumstances

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Rock Foundation Properties

Applicant

Esther Nyarwi Ndegwa

Applicant

Dosvelt Properties (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Eli Nathan Chaitowitz

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Reconsideration Application / Application for Reconsideration of Refusal of Petition for Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether exceptional circumstances exist to justify reconsideration of the refusal of leave to appeal under section 17(2)(f) of the Superior Courts Act.
  2. 2 Whether the suite of agreements between the parties constituted a simulated transaction amounting to an unlawful credit agreement under the National Credit Act.
  3. 3 Whether the applicants established a grave injustice or substantive point of law warranting reconsideration.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants failed to establish exceptional circumstances justifying reconsideration of the refusal of leave to appeal. The applicants' case rested on the assertion that the agreements were simulated transactions amounting to an unlawful credit agreement, but this was a factual dispute already determined by the High Court and previously rejected on petition. No substantive issue of law or grave injustice was demonstrated. The applicants' reliance on the 'Brusson-type' fraud argument was abandoned, and the remaining contentions were a mere repetition of arguments previously dismissed. The court held that section 17(2)(f) is reserved for truly exceptional cases,...

Court Disposition

Application for reconsideration dismissed; matter struck from the roll; costs awarded against the applicants.

Orders

  • The matter is struck from the roll.
  • The applicants are directed to pay, jointly and severally, the one paying the other to be absolved, the costs incurred by the respondent in opposing the application for reconsideration.