Rosslyn hub Development Company (Pty) Ltd v Surveyor General : Gauteng and Another (92339/19) [2020] ZAGPPHC 329 (7 May 2020)
The court found that Regulation 23(2A) clearly entitles the registered owner to request withdrawal of an approved but unregistered diagram, and there is no requirement for consent from Rand Water, as it is not the owner of the land. The Surveyor-General's refusal to withdraw the diagram was not supported by the regulation or any other legal provision. The urgency of the matter was justified by the commercial interests and the need to proceed with township development. The court also held that the late filing of answering affidavits by the respondents should be condoned. The application was granted, and the Surveyor-General was ordered to withdraw the diagram.
- Citation
- [2020] ZAGPPHC 329
- Parties
- Applicant: Rosslyn Hub Development Company (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Surveyor General : Gauteng; Respondent: Rand Water
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 7 May 2020
- Case Number
- 92339/19
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Final Judgment After Urgent Application
- Outcome
- Application granted. The Surveyor-General is ordered to withdraw the approved but unregistered diagram. Condonation for late filing of answering affidavits is granted. Costs awarded against respondents.
- Judges
- T J Raulinga
- Legal Topics
- Withdrawal of Approved Diagram, Land Surveyor Regulations, Servitude Registration, Urgent Interdict, Condonation of Late Filing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rosslyn Hub Development Company (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Surveyor General : Gauteng
Respondent
Rand Water
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Final Judgment After Urgent Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Surveyor-General is obliged to withdraw an approved but unregistered diagram upon written request of the registered owner under Regulation 23(2A).
- 2 Whether Rand Water's consent is required for the withdrawal of the diagram.
- 3 Whether the application is urgent and satisfies the requirements for urgency under Rule 6(12).
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that Regulation 23(2A) clearly entitles the registered owner to request withdrawal of an approved but unregistered diagram, and there is no requirement for consent from Rand Water, as it is not the owner of the land. The Surveyor-General's refusal to withdraw the diagram was not supported by the regulation or any other legal provision. The urgency of the matter was justified by the commercial interests and the need to proceed with township development. The court also held that the late filing of answering affidavits by the respondents should be condoned. The application was granted, and the Surveyor-General was ordered to withdraw the diagram.
Court Disposition
Application granted. The Surveyor-General is ordered to withdraw the approved but unregistered diagram. Condonation for late filing of answering affidavits is granted. Costs awarded against respondents.
Orders
- The forms and service provided for in the Uniform Rules of Court are dispensed with and the matter is disposed of as an urgent application.
- The first respondent is directed to withdraw, in terms of Regulation 23(2A), the unregistered but approved diagram SG 10602/1998.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment