Rothschild v AMT Construction (J1929/99) [1999] ZALC 128 (19 August 1999)
The court found that the applicant had made out a case for the granting of an order in terms of section 158(1)(c) of the Labour Relations Act. The citation of the respondent as AMT Construction was permissible under the Labour Court rules, and there was no fatal defect in the citation. The intervention by AMT Placements (Pty) Limited was not justified, as it was not the employer and had no substantive connection to the proceedings. The court exercised its discretion to make the arbitration award an order of court against AMT Construction, and ordered AMT Placements (Pty) Limited to pay the applicant's costs occasioned by its intervention.
- Citation
- [1999] ZALC 128
- Parties
- Applicant: Louis Anthony Rothschild; Respondent: AMT Construction; Respondent: AMT Placements (Pty) Limited
- Court
- Labour Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 19 August 1999
- Case Number
- J1929/99
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Application to Make Arbitration Award an Order of Court Under Section 158(1)(c) of the Labour Relations Act
- Outcome
- Application granted. The arbitration award is made an order of court. Costs awarded against AMT Placements (Pty) Limited for its intervention.
- Judges
- Stelzner
- Legal Topics
- Arbitration Award Enforcement, Party Citation, Costs Order, Section 158 Application
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Louis Anthony Rothschild
Applicant
AMT Construction
Respondent
AMT Placements (Pty) Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application to Make Arbitration Award an Order of Court Under Section 158(1)(c) of the Labour Relations Act
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arbitration award granted by the CCMA should be made an order of the Labour Court under section 158(1)(c) of the Labour Relations Act.
- 2 Whether the citation of the respondent as AMT Construction is fatally defective or permissible under the Labour Court rules.
- 3 Whether AMT Placements (Pty) Limited, as an intervening party, should bear the costs occasioned by its intervention.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had made out a case for the granting of an order in terms of section 158(1)(c) of the Labour Relations Act. The citation of the respondent as AMT Construction was permissible under the Labour Court rules, and there was no fatal defect in the citation. The intervention by AMT Placements (Pty) Limited was not justified, as it was not the employer and had no substantive connection to the proceedings. The court exercised its discretion to make the arbitration award an order of court against AMT Construction, and ordered AMT Placements (Pty) Limited to pay the applicant's costs occasioned by its intervention.
Court Disposition
Application granted. The arbitration award is made an order of court. Costs awarded against AMT Placements (Pty) Limited for its intervention.
Orders
- The arbitration award of 3 May 1999 under case number GA42154, ordering the respondent to pay the applicant R96,000.00 within 14 days, is made an order of this court.
- AMT Placements (Pty) Limited is ordered to pay the applicant's costs occasioned by its intervention in the proceedings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment