Russow v Reid and Another ([2011] 3 All SA 106 (GSJ)) [2011] ZAGPJHC 4; 50730/2007 (8 February 2011)
The court held that the applicant's right to recover the tax paid on the pension interest assigned to the first respondent arises ex lege under section 2B of the Second Schedule to the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962, and is not based on contract. The settlement agreement did not contemplate or waive this statutory right, nor did it preclude recovery of tax paid as a result of the first respondent's election to withdraw her assigned pension interest. The tax liability accrued to the applicant's account upon payment of the lump sum pension, and section 2B expressly permits recovery of such tax from the former spouse. The court found that the applicant is entitled to recover the amount of R135...
- Citation
- [2011] ZAGPJHC 4
- Parties
- Applicant: Nicolaas Louw Russow; Respondent: Engela (Louw) Reid; Respondent: Sasol Pension Fund
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 8 February 2011
- Case Number
- 50730/2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted. The first respondent is ordered to pay the applicant the tax amount deducted from his pension interest, and to pay the applicant's costs.
- Judges
- Mokgoatlheng
- Legal Topics
- Divorce Pension Interest, Tax Liability on Pension, Settlement Agreement Interpretation, Section 2b Income Tax Act, Section 37d Pension Funds Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nicolaas Louw Russow
Applicant
Engela (Louw) Reid
Respondent
Sasol Pension Fund
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to recover from the first respondent the tax paid on the pension interest assigned to her following divorce.
- 2 Whether the settlement agreement between the parties precludes the applicant from recovering the tax liability from the first respondent.
- 3 Whether section 2B of the Second Schedule to the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962 creates an ex lege right of recovery for the applicant.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the applicant's right to recover the tax paid on the pension interest assigned to the first respondent arises ex lege under section 2B of the Second Schedule to the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962, and is not based on contract. The settlement agreement did not contemplate or waive this statutory right, nor did it preclude recovery of tax paid as a result of the first respondent's election to withdraw her assigned pension interest. The tax liability accrued to the applicant's account upon payment of the lump sum pension, and section 2B expressly permits recovery of such tax from the former spouse. The court found that the applicant is entitled to recover the amount of R135...
Court Disposition
Application granted. The first respondent is ordered to pay the applicant the tax amount deducted from his pension interest, and to pay the applicant's costs.
Orders
- The first respondent is ordered to pay to the second respondent the amount of R135 614.27 to be credited to the applicant's pension interest in the second respondent.
- The first respondent is ordered to pay the applicant's costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment