S M v S (676/18) [2018] ZASCA 162 (28 November 2018)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that section 276B of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977, which allows a court to fix a non-parole period, does not apply retrospectively to offences committed before its commencement on 1 October 2004. The appellant's offences were committed and sentenced before this date. The full court erred in fixing a non-parole period, as the legislative intent and clear language of the section preclude retrospective operation. At the time of sentencing, parole eligibility was governed by the Correctional Services Act 8 of 1959, which allowed prisoners to earn credits and be considered for parole after serving half their sentence. The appellant has already served...
- Citation
- [2018] ZASCA 162
- Parties
- Appellant: S M; Respondent: The State
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 28 November 2018
- Case Number
- 676/18
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; order fixing non-parole period set aside.
- Judges
- Cachalia, Wallis, Makgoka, Carelse, Matojane
- Legal Topics
- Non Parole Period, Retrospective Application of Statute, Sentencing, Parole Eligibility
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
S M
Appellant
The State
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the order fixing a non-parole period under section 276B of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 was valid for offences committed before the section came into operation.
- 2 Whether the appellant is entitled to be considered for parole under the Correctional Services Act 8 of 1959.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that section 276B of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977, which allows a court to fix a non-parole period, does not apply retrospectively to offences committed before its commencement on 1 October 2004. The appellant's offences were committed and sentenced before this date. The full court erred in fixing a non-parole period, as the legislative intent and clear language of the section preclude retrospective operation. At the time of sentencing, parole eligibility was governed by the Correctional Services Act 8 of 1959, which allowed prisoners to earn credits and be considered for parole after serving half their sentence. The appellant has already served...
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; order fixing non-parole period set aside.
Orders
- The appeal against the order fixing a non-parole period is upheld.
- The order of the court below fixing a non-parole period is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment