Download PDF

South Africa Judgment

Eastern Cape High Court, Grahamstown

S v A.N (CA&R15/2018) [2018] ZAECGHC 3 (16 January 2018)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The accused was seventeen years old at the time of the alleged offence. The Child Justice Act applies to persons under eighteen years of age who are alleged to have committed offences. The proceedings before the Magistrate did not comply with the requirements of the Child Justice Act. Therefore, the proceedings must be set aside and the matter remitted to the Magistrates’ Court for the accused to be dealt with in accordance with the Child Justice Act.

Court disposition

Proceedings before the Magistrate are set aside and the matter is remitted for compliance with the Child Justice Act.

Orders

  • The proceedings in respect of Case No A 5765/2017 are set aside.
  • The matter is remitted back to the Magistrates’ Court, East London for the accused to be dealt with in terms of the provisions of the Child Justice Act, Act 75 of 2008.

02

Material facts

Parties

The State

Respondent

A. N.

Applicant

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Review Application / Special Review Under Section 304(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The accused's legal representative informed the court that the accused was a minor at the time of the alleged offence. School records confirmed the accused's date of birth as [...] 2000, making him seventeen years old. It was argued that the accused should have been dealt with in terms of the Child Justice Act, which provides for special procedures and protections for minors.
Respondent
The State did not oppose the setting aside of the proceedings and agreed that the accused, being under eighteen at the time of the offence, should be dealt with in accordance with the Child Justice Act.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Child Justice Act 75 of 2008

    Children alleged to have committed offences and who are under eighteen years of age must be dealt with in accordance with the Child Justice Act, which provides for special treatment and procedures.

  2. 02

    Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977

    Section 304(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act empowers the High Court to set aside proceedings that are not in accordance with the law.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The accused was seventeen years old at the time of the alleged offence. The Child Justice Act applies to persons under eighteen years of age who are alleged to have committed offences. The proceedings before the Magistrate did not comply with the requirements of the Child Justice Act. Therefore, the proceedings must be set aside and the matter remitted to the Magistrates’ Court for the accused to be dealt with in accordance with the Child Justice Act.

Obiter and limits

  • The Child Justice Act is designed to break the cycle of crime and prevent children from being exposed to the adverse effects of the formal criminal justice system.
  • It is imperative that courts ascertain the age of accused persons to ensure proper application of the law.

Court disposition

Proceedings before the Magistrate are set aside and the matter is remitted for compliance with the Child Justice Act.

  • The proceedings in respect of Case No A 5765/2017 are set aside.
  • The matter is remitted back to the Magistrates’ Court, East London for the accused to be dealt with in terms of the provisions of the Child Justice Act, Act 75 of 2008.

Source and reliance status

Eastern Cape High Court, Grahamstown

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Eastern Cape High Court, Grahamstown

Judgment

[2018] ZAECGHC 3

SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy

IN

THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

(EASTERN CAPE DIVISION, GRAHAMSTOWN)

CASE NO.: CA&R15/2018

DELIVERED: 16 – 1 – 18

In the matter between:

THE STATE

And

A. N.

REVIEW JUDGMENT

BESHE J:

[1] This is a special review pursuant to the provisions of Section 304 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977. The order that is sought is for the setting aside of the proceedings that took place before the Magistrate, East London in respect of this matter.

[2] The accused together with another were arraigned in the East London Magistrates’ Court on a charge of housebreaking with intent to steal and theft. They made their first appearance on the 17 April 2017. His age was given as nineteen (19) years in the charge sheet. Although bail was fixed at R500.00, only his co-accused paid the R500.00. After numerous postponements and separation of trials, accused’s trial got underway on 19 October 2017, It was during the course of the trial that accused’s legal representative informed the presiding officer that accused had informed her that he was a minor during an adjournment.

[3] The investigating officer followed up on the issue pertaining to accused’s age and obtained copies of school records which

confirmed accused’s date of birth as being the [...] 2000, which meant that he was seventeen (17) years old.

[4] The Child Justice Act[1] (the Act) is aimed at, inter alia, providing for special treatment of children in a child justice system that is designed to break the cycle of crime and to prevent children from being exposed to the adverse effects of the formal criminal justice system.[2]

[5] The Act applies to any person in the Republic who is alleged to have committed an offence and –

(a) was under the age of 10 years at the time of the commission of the alleged offence; or

(b) was 10 years or older but under the age of 18 years when he or she

(i) … … … .

(ii) … … … .

(iii) arrested in terms of section 20, for that offence.[3]

[6] The accused, by virtue of his age, falls to be dealt with in accordance with the Child Justice Act.

[7] Accordingly, the proceedings in respect of Case No A 5765/2017 are set aside.

The matter is remitted back to the Magistrates’ Court, East London for the accused to be dealt with in terms of the provisions of the Child Justice Act, Act 75 of 2008.

______

N

G BESHE

JUDGE

OF THE HIGH COURT

ROBERSON

J

I agree.

___

JM

ROBERSON

[1] Act 75 of 2008.

[2] Section 2 (c) – (d) of the Act.

[3] Section 4 (1) (a) – (b) of the Act.

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Child Justice Act 75 of 2008

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.